-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: small code cleanups #17
Conversation
- use relative imports - cleanup unreachable code
Warning Rate limit exceeded@bdraco has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 54 minutes and 2 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe recent changes across multiple files in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- src/uiprotect/data/base.py (5 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/bootstrap.py (4 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/convert.py (2 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/devices.py (2 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/nvr.py (3 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/user.py (1 hunks)
- src/uiprotect/data/websocket.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- src/uiprotect/data/devices.py
- src/uiprotect/data/nvr.py
- src/uiprotect/data/user.py
- src/uiprotect/data/websocket.py
Additional comments not posted (9)
src/uiprotect/data/convert.py (2)
Line range hint
7-19
: Switch to relative imports for better modularity and maintainability.
22-23
: Good use of conditional imports to handle optional dependencies or features.src/uiprotect/data/bootstrap.py (4)
10-10
: Switch to relative imports and conditional imports enhances modularity and prepares the code for potential type checking during development.
Line range hint
19-41
: The restructuring of imports using relative paths is a good practice in a modular codebase.
48-50
: Proper use of conditional imports underTYPE_CHECKING
to avoid runtime overhead while enabling better type checks during development.
205-207
: Ensure that the conditional assignment of theapi
variable is robust and handles all expected cases correctly.Verification successful
The conditional assignment of the
api
variable in bothbootstrap.py
andbase.py
appears to be robust and handles the expected cases correctly. The code checks ifdata.get("api")
returns a value; if not, it assignscls._api
ifcls
is an instance ofProtectBaseObject
, otherwise it assignsNone
.
src/uiprotect/data/bootstrap.py
lines 205-207src/uiprotect/data/base.py
lines 335-337Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `api` variable in conditional assignments across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `api` variable. Expect: Proper handling in all occurrences. rg --type python $'api:'Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `api` variable in conditional assignments across the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `api` variable. Expect: Proper handling in all occurrences. rg --type py $'api:'Length of output: 1004
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract lines of code where `api` variable is conditionally assigned for detailed inspection. # Extract relevant lines from `bootstrap.py` rg --type py --line-number --context 5 'api: ProtectApiClient \| None = data.get\("api"\) or \(' src/uiprotect/data/bootstrap.py # Extract relevant lines from `base.py` rg --type py --line-number --context 5 'api: ProtectApiClient \| None = data.get\("api"\) or \(' src/uiprotect/data/base.pyLength of output: 1179
src/uiprotect/data/base.py (3)
14-23
: Switch to relative imports for utility functions and exceptions.This change aligns with the PR's objective to use relative imports, enhancing modularity and potentially reducing coupling between modules.
24-31
: Switch to relative imports for types and websocket-related classes.Continuing the theme of the PR, this change correctly updates the import paths to relative, which is beneficial for the reasons mentioned previously.
53-56
: Use of relative imports within type checking condition.This is a good use of conditional imports based on
TYPE_CHECKING
to avoid runtime import costs while ensuring type hints are available during development.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
|
Description of change
Summary by CodeRabbit
Refactor
Chores