-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merge latest RUC LSM into community develop #49
Merge latest RUC LSM into community develop #49
Conversation
tanyasmirnova
commented
Mar 8, 2023
- Updated computation of snow cover fraction and snow thermal conductivity
- Other changes that are implemented in the real-time RRFS_B.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this PR is still a draft, but we thought it was time it got some attention.
I have some suggestions and if you like, I can open a PR into this branch in the coming days?
affect results for physics suites not using RUC LSM.
"surface_exchange_coefficient_for_heat_at_2m" which is provided only by MYNN surface layer scheme and not the others. Now this variable is comuted internally in sfc_diag.f.
@tanyasmirnova I noticed that this PR is undoing some recent changes in ccpp-physics. Can you please merge the latest ufs/dev branch into your PR branch to make reviewing easier? |
…n. Uncommented snowd_land, and removed snowd_water.
print statements.
…nt_vardens_over_land Same for ice.
…surface_scheme) is removed.
…e use of RUC LSM.
…oilveg_ruc as they are moved to the namelist options in GFS_typedefs.F90.
Hello, I think we're ready to continue working towards merging #1646. @tanyasmirnova are you able to resolve the conversations in this PR and request final approval? |
@zach1221 I resolved all reviewer's comments and would like to get final approvals from reviewers. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We'll clean up use of physcons later since all testing has been done.
The developer has addressed comments and testing is finished for this work. We need to merge to meet deadlines.
@grantfirl all tests are done: ufs-community/ufs-weather-model#1646. can you go ahead to merge this pr? @dustinswales can you approve the pr? |