Add groupBy for NonEmptySet #2285
Conversation
| * Groups elements inside this `NonEmptySet` according to the `Order` | ||
| * of the keys produced by the given mapping function. | ||
| */ | ||
| def groupBy[B](f: A => B)(implicit B: Order[B]): NonEmptyMap[B, NonEmptySet[A]] = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If we're returning NonEmptyMap here, does it make sense to make NonEmptyList#groupBy also return a non-empty map? @LukaJCB
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah that's probably true, but we can't change it without breaking compatibility
|
Right. I'm sooo excited for the 2.x branch ;)
…On Sat, Jun 9, 2018, 12:52 Luka Jacobowitz ***@***.***> wrote:
***@***.**** commented on this pull request.
------------------------------
In core/src/main/scala/cats/data/NonEmptySet.scala
<#2285 (comment)>:
> @@ -346,6 +346,21 @@ sealed class NonEmptySetOps[A](val value: NonEmptySet[A]) {
*/
def zipWithIndex: NonEmptySet[(A, Int)] =
NonEmptySetImpl.create(toSortedSet.zipWithIndex)
+
+ /**
+ * Groups elements inside this `NonEmptySet` according to the `Order`
+ * of the keys produced by the given mapping function.
+ */
+ def groupBy[B](f: A => B)(implicit B: Order[B]): NonEmptyMap[B, NonEmptySet[A]] = {
Yeah that's probably true, but we can't change it without breaking
compatibility
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2285 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2npN2WR_5nkVpLBKPbM2gawFhS6yrZks5t67bygaJpZM4UhTAQ>
.
|
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2285 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 95.03% 95.05% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 337 338 +1
Lines 5840 5850 +10
Branches 222 220 -2
==========================================
+ Hits 5550 5561 +11
+ Misses 290 289 -1
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
to make this available with |
|
Sorry I missed that. |
|
What we did forget is to add a specific import for these syntax extensions, we should add an |
|
@LukaJCB any test that we can have for this? |
|
@Obarros I think there is a spec that checks if syntax compiles. Look for I think the list syntax isn't there, so we could add that now that we're at it |
Obarros
force-pushed
the
groupByNES-2282
branch
2 times, most recently
from
2ac680e to
7ce57d8
Compare
|
looks good, |
| val grouped: SortedMap[B, NonEmptySet[A]] = set.groupByNes(f) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| def testNonEmptyList[A: Order, B: Order] : Unit = { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think we don't need this Order constraint on A, leaving it on B should be enough. :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, @LukaJCB.
Let me remove it, I will also rebase on top of the latest master before squashing the commits and push.
|
@Obarros, it's no big deal but it's not necessary to squash before merge. We usually do squash merge (meaning all commits on pr will be squashed on merge by GitHub) . Having separate commits helps reviewing the latest changes. |
Should fixe #2282.
@LukaJCB PTAL.