Add support for scalatest eventually #171
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
By implementing the Retrying typeclass we can use the eventually construct to retry evaluation of the enclosed IO.
|
This looks very nice! |
|
@skennedy Would you be interested in doing something similar to this for series/1.x? That's the current branch, targeting Cats Effect 3. |
|
Sure, I'd be happy to look into that |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By implementing the Retrying typeclass we can use the eventually construct to retry evaluation of the enclosed IO.
https://www.scalatest.org/scaladoc/3.1.1/org/scalatest/concurrent/Eventually.html
Happy to raise a similar PR for 1.x (although I am still very much a newbie with CE3).
PS - Thanks for all your efforts, I am a massive fan of the ecosystem ❤️