Add Note About Changing to MIT

[rhodrykorb]

No description provided.

[juthilo]

Typo: contribution
And the link should point to /MIT, right? LICENSE is Apache.

[rhodrykorb]

@juthilo I have also contributed a MIT file, so the project contains the license. It was a suggestion that we include a copy of the license. I will fix the typo.

[juthilo]

Yes, that's what I meant. ...../MIT instead of ...../LICENSE.

[rhodrykorb]

Oh - should have reread my code :)

I better fix that.

[juthilo]

There are some typos on this line - I would perhaps write:
and are in the process of collecting permissions to do so from all authors of Bootstrap code that is still in the current code base.

[rhodrykorb]

Fair call and I agree.
Was just using wording previously suggested.

[cvrebert]

I don't see any particular reason to mention 3.0.1 here.

[MrKeiKun]

add new line perhaps?

[ghost]

-Jog 2013 Twitter, Inc. az az Apache 2.0 licenc

[mdo]

For v3.1 we will be changing the license from Apache to MIT and are in the process of collecting permissions to do so from all authors of Bootstrap code that is still in the current code base.
For details please see issue #2054 at #2054

By contributing your code, you agree to dual-license your contribution under the terms of the APLv2: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE and MIT License: https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/MIT

In the contributing file, let's use this instead. More succinct and, with shorter sentences, a bit easier to read (I hope).

With v3.1, we're moving from the Apache 2 to the MIT license for the Bootstrap code (not the docs). We're in the process of collecting permissions from all Bootstrap contributors with code still part of the project to make this happen. For details, please see [#2054](https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/2054).

By contributing your code, you agree to dual-license your contribution under [Apache 2](https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/LICENSE) and [MIT](https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/blob/master/MIT) licenses.

Let's also rename MIT to LICENSE-MIT perhaps? Would help group the two things together more logically.

For the readme, instead of this:

For v3.1 we will be changing the license from Apache to MIT, please refer to CONTRIBUTING for more information.

Let's use this:

With v3.1, we're moving from the Apache 2 to the MIT license for the Bootstrap code (not the docs). Please see the [contributing guidelines](strap/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) for more information.

Beyond that, one more point of clarification is needed I think. Are we relicensing, or dual licensing? We say we're changing or moving in many places, and in one we say we need it to be dual-licensed. Which is it? I have a feeling those differences could matter.

[juthilo]

Closing in favor of #11105