Adding the capability to create the approval issue in the another repository #142
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Any updates on this pull request? Would love to use this feature |
|
This PR is ready, I am just waiting on the admin to merge this but you can use it from my repo, it is public https://github.com/sunny-1651/manual-approval/ just replace trstringer/manual-approval@v1 by sunny-1651/manual-approval@dev |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR aims to fix #122 and could potentially resolve #134 (I have not tested this case but with this update, the developer can tweak his pipeline to make it work)
If given the two env variables target-repository & target-repository-owner then the issue will be created in that repo else in the same.
While adding the functionality the previous format/syntax is not broken and can be used the same way as it was used earlier [also the reason for going ahead with env variables instead of another input].
To verify I used these two runs: