Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove TableLayout from Elasticsearch connector #883

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2019

Conversation

Praveen2112
Copy link
Member

Removes the TableLayout for Elasticsearch connector. (#781)

@Praveen2112 Praveen2112 force-pushed the es_table_layout_removal branch from 478f845 to d14e876 Compare June 1, 2019 13:37
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jun 1, 2019
@Praveen2112 Praveen2112 force-pushed the es_table_layout_removal branch from d14e876 to f083269 Compare June 2, 2019 08:34
group.getShardId().getId(),
nodes[nodeIndex].getHostName(),
nodes[nodeIndex].getAddress().getPort(),
layoutHandle.getTupleDomain());
tableHandle.getConstraint());
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The table handle is now available in getRecordSet, so we should be able to create the recordset directly with the constraint extracted from the handle instead of passing it via the splits.

@Praveen2112 Praveen2112 force-pushed the es_table_layout_removal branch from f083269 to afbab2d Compare June 4, 2019 02:00
@Praveen2112 Praveen2112 force-pushed the es_table_layout_removal branch from afbab2d to aa5667f Compare June 4, 2019 06:17
Copy link
Member

@martint martint left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good. I'll merge it once Travis passes.

@martint martint merged commit 1ea1542 into trinodb:master Jun 4, 2019
@martint martint added this to the 314 milestone Jun 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants