Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary OperatorFactories interface #18426

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2023

Conversation

raunaqmorarka
Copy link
Member

Description

Additional context and related issues

Release notes

(x) This is not user-visible or docs only and no release notes are required.
( ) Release notes are required, please propose a release note for me.
( ) Release notes are required, with the following suggested text:

# Section
* Fix some things. ({issue}`issuenumber`)

@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Jul 26, 2023
@raunaqmorarka raunaqmorarka requested review from electrum and dain July 26, 2023 13:44
Copy link
Member

@electrum electrum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We could consider making this class static if we don't expect to have dependencies later.

@@ -32,9 +32,7 @@
import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;

public class TrinoOperatorFactories
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's rename this to OperatorFactories since the Trino prefix doesn't add any value. This will make the diff smaller, too. We could also make this class final.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renamed the class and made it static

@raunaqmorarka raunaqmorarka merged commit e146c8b into trinodb:master Jul 27, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 423 milestone Jul 27, 2023
@raunaqmorarka raunaqmorarka deleted the clean-join branch August 22, 2023 06:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants