Add 365 release notes #10145
Merged
Add 365 release notes #10145
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ebyhr
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
hashhar
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
losipiuk
reviewed
Dec 2, 2021
phd3
reviewed
Dec 3, 2021
martint
force-pushed
the
relnotes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9956687 to
a9a8ede
Compare
kokosing
reviewed
Dec 3, 2021
| * Account memory used for tracking information about deleted rows when reading from Hive ACID tables. ({issue}`9914`, {issue}`10070`) | ||
| * Fix `REVOKE GRANT OPTION` to revoke only the granting instead of revoking entire privilege. ({issue}`10094`) | ||
| * Fix bug that skips writing bloom filters for ORC files. ({issue}`9792`) | ||
| * Fix bug where incorrect rows were deleted when deleting from a transactional table that has original files (before the first major compaction). ({issue}`10095`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This sounds serious. Should we put it to the top and some emphasise it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We normally list changes in order of:
- new features
- performance improvements
- bug fixes
Not sure where we would put this to make it more prominent.
| * Fix bug where incorrect rows were deleted when deleting from a transactional table that has original files (before the first major compaction). ({issue}`10095`) | ||
| * Fix delete and update failure when changing a table after a major compaction. ({issue}`10120`) | ||
| * Fix incorrect results when decoding decimal values in Parquet reader. ({issue}`9971`) | ||
| * Fix ``hive.dynamic-filtering.wait-timeout`` not having any effect. ({issue}`10106`) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't get it? Does it mean that previously that flag was not effective? Can we improve wording?
Fix
....to be effective, previously flag was ignored.
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As far as I understand it, it wasn't being ignored, but there was a bug in the implementation.
martint
force-pushed
the
relnotes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f047840 to
d0cca7f
Compare
electrum
reviewed
Dec 3, 2021
|
@electrum, updated |
electrum
approved these changes
Dec 4, 2021
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #9826