Added 3 categories for Storybook structure #1918
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dottorblaster
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2023
EMaksy
approved these changes
Oct 11, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR attempts to create some structure in Storybook. It introduces three categories: Components, Patterns (placeholder title for now) and Layouts. These categories will group components based on the amount of elements creating each component. Similarly to the Atomic Design approach we are using Components as or smallest element, then we have Patterns which consist of a group of Components and lastly we have the biggest being Layouts which are a combination of Patterns and Components.
By having these categories it will help to quickly identify outstanding components, and which stories are related to page layouts for example.
Fixes # (issue)
A growing list of unorganised components.
How was this tested?
Visually