Update treesitter to 0.19.2

[zegervdv]

I am trying to update tree-sitter to version 0.19.2 (for nvim-treesitter/nvim-treesitter#1000) and found a new error when generating the code:

Unresolved conflict for symbol sequence:

  '['  _identifier  •  '.'  …

Possible interpretations:

  1:  '['  (_sequence_identifier  _identifier)  •  '.'  …
  2:  '['  (generate_block_identifier  _identifier)  •  '.'  …
  3:  '['  (hierarchical_identifier_repeat1  _identifier  •  '.')  (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)
  4:  '['  (let_expression  _identifier)  •  '.'  …                (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)
  5:  '['  (primary  _identifier  •  select1)                      (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)
  6:  '['  (primary  _identifier)  •  '.'  …                       (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)
  7:  '['  (sequence_instance  _identifier)  •  '.'  …             (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)
  8:  '['  (tf_call  _identifier)  •  '.'  …                       (precedence: 0, associativity: Left)

Possible resolutions:

  1:  Specify a higher precedence in `primary` and `hierarchical_identifier_repeat1` than in the other rules.
  2:  Specify a higher precedence in `sequence_instance` than in the other rules.
  3:  Specify a higher precedence in `let_expression` than in the other rules.
  4:  Specify a higher precedence in `tf_call` than in the other rules.
  5:  Specify a higher precedence in `primary` than in the other rules.
  6:  Specify a higher precedence in `generate_block_identifier` than in the other rules.
  7:  Specify a higher precedence in `_sequence_identifier` than in the other rules.
  8:  Specify a left or right associativity in `sequence_instance` and `let_expression` and `tf_call` and `primary` and `generate_block_identifier` and `_sequence_identifier`
  9:  Add a conflict for these rules: `sequence_instance`, `let_expression`, `tf_call`, `primary`, `generate_block_identifier`, `_sequence_identifier`

I wonder if this is somehow related to #43 ? Do you have an idea how to fix this error?

[drom]

It does look like an issue with grammar. Let me debug it.
#47

[drom]

I fixed it in v0.20.0. Please try

[zegervdv]

Yes that seems to work. Thanks!