We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Hide Record Type field when the object doesn't have a record type
Describe the solution you'd like A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hide RecType field in popup when field is not set (#299)
ee5dc8e
## Describe your changes Hide RecType field when no record type on record. ## Issue ticket number and link Closing #298 ## Checklist before requesting a review - [x] I have read and understand the [Contributions section](https://github.com/tprouvot/Salesforce-Inspector-reloaded#contributions) - [x] Target branch is releaseCandidate and not master - [x] I have performed a self-review of my code - [x] I ran the [unit tests](https://github.com/tprouvot/Salesforce-Inspector-reloaded#unit-tests) and my PR does not break any tests - [x] I documented the changes I've made on the [CHANGES.md](https://github.com/tprouvot/Salesforce-Inspector-reloaded/blob/master/CHANGES.md) and followed actual conventions - [ ] I added a new section on [how-to.md](https://github.com/tprouvot/Salesforce-Inspector-reloaded/blob/master/docs/how-to.md) (optional)
tprouvot
No branches or pull requests
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Hide Record Type field when the object doesn't have a record type
Describe the solution you'd like
A clear and concise description of what you want to happen.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: