-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
replaced readme with the text MOTHER Tatyana Kurtukova #860
Conversation
commit ea73179 upstream. Michael reported that we are seeing an ftrace bug on bootup when KASAN is enabled and we are using -fpatchable-function-entry: ftrace: allocating 47780 entries in 18 pages ftrace-powerpc: 0xc0000000020b3d5c: No module provided for non-kernel address ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------ ftrace faulted on modifying [<c0000000020b3d5c>] 0xc0000000020b3d5c Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c00000000008cef4 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2180 ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef torvalds#860 Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries NIP: c0000000003aa81c LR: c0000000003aa818 CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c0000000033cfab0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef) MSR: 8000000002021033 <SF,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28028240 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000002781a8 IRQMASK: 3 ... NIP [c0000000003aa81c] ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424 LR [c0000000003aa818] ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 Call Trace: ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 (unreliable) ftrace_process_locs+0x5f4/0x8a0 ftrace_init+0xc0/0x1d0 start_kernel+0x1d8/0x484 With CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY=y and CONFIG_KASAN=y, compiler emits nops in functions that it generates for registering and unregistering global variables (unlike with -pg and -mprofile-kernel where calls to _mcount() are not generated in those functions). Those functions then end up in INIT_TEXT and EXIT_TEXT respectively. We don't expect to see any profiled functions in EXIT_TEXT, so ftrace_init_nop() assumes that all addresses that aren't in the core kernel text belongs to a module. Since these functions do not match that criteria, we see the above bug. Address this by having ftrace ignore all locations in the text exit sections of vmlinux. Fixes: 0f71dcf ("powerpc/ftrace: Add support for -fpatchable-function-entry") Cc: [email protected] # v6.6+ Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gray <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Bruh😭 |
crazy |
Excuse my ignorance but, how will they actually read it though? I don't think blind people print repos into braille paper. |
🤣 |
Hi @gmehdiev! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Where do I send my contribution?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
Michael reported that we are seeing an ftrace bug on bootup when KASAN is enabled and we are using -fpatchable-function-entry: ftrace: allocating 47780 entries in 18 pages ftrace-powerpc: 0xc0000000020b3d5c: No module provided for non-kernel address ------------[ ftrace bug ]------------ ftrace faulted on modifying [<c0000000020b3d5c>] 0xc0000000020b3d5c Initializing ftrace call sites ftrace record flags: 0 (0) expected tramp: c00000000008cef4 ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/trace/ftrace.c:2180 ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef torvalds#860 Hardware name: IBM pSeries (emulated by qemu) POWER9 (raw) 0x4e1202 0xf000005 of:SLOF,HEAD hv:linux,kvm pSeries NIP: c0000000003aa81c LR: c0000000003aa818 CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c0000000033cfab0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (6.5.0-rc3-00120-g0f71dcfb4aef) MSR: 8000000002021033 <SF,VEC,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28028240 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000002781a8 IRQMASK: 3 ... NIP [c0000000003aa81c] ftrace_bug+0x3c0/0x424 LR [c0000000003aa818] ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 Call Trace: ftrace_bug+0x3bc/0x424 (unreliable) ftrace_process_locs+0x5f4/0x8a0 ftrace_init+0xc0/0x1d0 start_kernel+0x1d8/0x484 With CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY=y and CONFIG_KASAN=y, compiler emits nops in functions that it generates for registering and unregistering global variables (unlike with -pg and -mprofile-kernel where calls to _mcount() are not generated in those functions). Those functions then end up in INIT_TEXT and EXIT_TEXT respectively. We don't expect to see any profiled functions in EXIT_TEXT, so ftrace_init_nop() assumes that all addresses that aren't in the core kernel text belongs to a module. Since these functions do not match that criteria, we see the above bug. Address this by having ftrace ignore all locations in the text exit sections of vmlinux. Fixes: 0f71dcf ("powerpc/ftrace: Add support for -fpatchable-function-entry") Cc: [email protected] # v6.6+ Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Naveen N Rao <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Benjamin Gray <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
Sorry, but I dont see how people would have an easier time recognizing a pattern of tiny dots compared to regular letters. |
Visually impaired folks can, will and should use their screen reader (narration/braille tool) of choice. This PR is, in my opinion, very ignorant. Visually impaired people have better solutions to this universal problem, and this particular solution doesn't actually work. |
Ain't no way |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are missing a ⠉
somewhere
lol |
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree instead() of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]>
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
commit 3c58a95 upstream. In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit 3c58a95 upstream. In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit 3c58a95 upstream. In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
commit 3c58a95 upstream. In netfs_init() or fscache_proc_init(), we create dentry under 'fs/netfs', but in netfs_exit(), we only delete the proc entry of 'fs/netfs' without deleting its subtree. This triggers the following WARNING: ================================================================== remove_proc_entry: removing non-empty directory 'fs/netfs', leaking at least 'requests' WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 566 at fs/proc/generic.c:717 remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Modules linked in: netfs(-) CPU: 4 UID: 0 PID: 566 Comm: rmmod Not tainted 6.11.0-rc3 torvalds#860 RIP: 0010:remove_proc_entry+0x160/0x1c0 Call Trace: <TASK> netfs_exit+0x12/0x620 [netfs] __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x14c/0x2e0 do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x110 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e ================================================================== Therefore use remove_proc_subtree() instead of remove_proc_entry() to fix the above problem. Fixes: 7eb5b3e ("netfs, fscache: Move /proc/fs/fscache to /proc/fs/netfs and put in a symlink") Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ГОЙДА
Added braille font, I think it is extremely inappropriate that Linux does not care about people with low vision