-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update README #580
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Update README #580
Conversation
Hi @jackm9367! Thanks for your contribution to the Linux kernel! Linux kernel development happens on mailing lists, rather than on GitHub - this GitHub repository is a read-only mirror that isn't used for accepting contributions. So that your change can become part of Linux, please email it to us as a patch. Sending patches isn't quite as simple as sending a pull request, but fortunately it is a well documented process. Here's what to do:
How do I format my contribution?The Linux kernel community is notoriously picky about how contributions are formatted and sent. Fortunately, they have documented their expectations. Firstly, all contributions need to be formatted as patches. A patch is a plain text document showing the change you want to make to the code, and documenting why it is a good idea. You can create patches with Secondly, patches need 'commit messages', which is the human-friendly documentation explaining what the change is and why it's necessary. Thirdly, changes have some technical requirements. There is a Linux kernel coding style, and there are licensing requirements you need to comply with. Both of these are documented in the Submitting Patches documentation that is part of the kernel. Note that you will almost certainly have to modify your existing git commits to satisfy these requirements. Don't worry: there are many guides on the internet for doing this. Who do I send my contribution to?The Linux kernel is composed of a number of subsystems. These subsystems are maintained by different people, and have different mailing lists where they discuss proposed changes. If you don't already know what subsystem your change belongs to, the
Make sure that your list of recipients includes a mailing list. If you can't find a more specific mailing list, then LKML - the Linux Kernel Mailing List - is the place to send your patches. It's not usually necessary to subscribe to the mailing list before you send the patches, but if you're interested in kernel development, subscribing to a subsystem mailing list is a good idea. (At this point, you probably don't need to subscribe to LKML - it is a very high traffic list with about a thousand messages per day, which is often not useful for beginners.) How do I send my contribution?Use For more information about using How do I get help if I'm stuck?Firstly, don't get discouraged! There are an enormous number of resources on the internet, and many kernel developers who would like to see you succeed. Many issues - especially about how to use certain tools - can be resolved by using your favourite internet search engine. If you can't find an answer, there are a few places you can turn:
If you get really, really stuck, you could try the owners of this bot, @daxtens and @ajdlinux. Please be aware that we do have full-time jobs, so we are almost certainly the slowest way to get answers! I sent my patch - now what?You wait. You can check that your email has been received by checking the mailing list archives for the mailing list you sent your patch to. Messages may not be received instantly, so be patient. Kernel developers are generally very busy people, so it may take a few weeks before your patch is looked at. Then, you keep waiting. Three things may happen:
Further information
Happy hacking! This message was posted by a bot - if you have any questions or suggestions, please talk to my owners, @ajdlinux and @daxtens, or raise an issue at https://github.com/ajdlinux/KernelPRBot. |
When a tail call fails, it is documented that the tail call should continue execution at the following instruction. An example tail call sequence is: 12: (85) call bpf_tail_call#12 13: (b7) r0 = 0 14: (95) exit The ARM assembler for the tail call in this case ends up branching to instruction 14 instead of instruction 13, resulting in the BPF filter returning a non-zero value: 178: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#588] ; insn 12 17c: ldr r6, [r8, r6] 180: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#580] 184: cmp r8, r6 188: bcs 0x1e8 18c: ldr r6, [sp, torvalds#524] 190: ldr r7, [sp, torvalds#528] 194: cmp r7, #0 198: cmpeq r6, torvalds#32 19c: bhi 0x1e8 1a0: adds r6, r6, #1 1a4: adc r7, r7, #0 1a8: str r6, [sp, torvalds#524] 1ac: str r7, [sp, torvalds#528] 1b0: mov r6, torvalds#104 1b4: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#588] 1b8: add r6, r8, r6 1bc: ldr r8, [sp, torvalds#580] 1c0: lsl r7, r8, #2 1c4: ldr r6, [r6, r7] 1c8: cmp r6, #0 1cc: beq 0x1e8 1d0: mov r8, torvalds#32 1d4: ldr r6, [r6, r8] 1d8: add r6, r6, torvalds#44 1dc: bx r6 1e0: mov r0, #0 ; insn 13 1e4: mov r1, #0 1e8: add sp, sp, torvalds#596 ; insn 14 1ec: pop {r4, r5, r6, r7, r8, sl, pc} For other sequences, the tail call could end up branching midway through the following BPF instructions, or maybe off the end of the function, leading to unknown behaviours. Fixes: 39c13c2 ("arm: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Russell King <[email protected]>
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#12: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:12: +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_1ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b1Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#14: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:14: +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_1ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b1Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#154: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:154: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u32 disRateMask ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#169: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:169: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#207: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:207: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#234: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:234: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#260: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:260: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#288: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:288: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#317: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:317: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#334: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:334: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#395: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:395: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_MonitorWiFiCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#481: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:481: +static bool halbtc8723b1ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#516: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:516: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#518: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:518: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#580: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:580: +static u8 halbtc8723b1ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#582: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:582: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#808: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:808: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#836: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:836: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:853: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#890: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:890: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#933: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:933: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#991: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:991: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1012: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1012: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1046: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1046: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1057: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1057: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1108: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1108: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRA ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1121: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1121: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1124: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1124: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1310: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1310: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 byte1, u8 byte2, u8 byte3, u8 byte4, u8 byte5 ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1364: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1364: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1367: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1367: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1664: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1664: +static bool halbtc8723b1ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1755: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1755: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1944: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1944: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bNewPsState ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1966: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1966: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 psType, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2014: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2014: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiMultiPort(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2022: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2022: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2028: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2028: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2030: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2030: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2070: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2070: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2073: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2073: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2090: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2090: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2095: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2095: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2144: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiNotConnected(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2155: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2155: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2158: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2158: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2189: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2189: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2192: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2213: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2213: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiConnectedScan(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2215: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2246: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2246: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2249: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2249: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2270: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2270: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiConnected(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2390: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2390: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_RunSwCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2449: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2449: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2451: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2451: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2582: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2582: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2596: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2596: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2651: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2651: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2653: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2653: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2703: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2703: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2708: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2708: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2723: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2725: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2725: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2726: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2726: + struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2727: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2727: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3186: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3186: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3212: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3212: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3230: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3230: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3320: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3320: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3377: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3447: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3447: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3536: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3536: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3701: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3701: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3716: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3716: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3738: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3738: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]>
This commit fixes the following checkpatch.pl errors: ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#12: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:12: +static struct COEX_DM_8723B_1ANT * pCoexDm = &GLCoexDm8723b1Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#14: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:14: +static struct COEX_STA_8723B_1ANT * pCoexSta = &GLCoexSta8723b1Ant; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#154: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:154: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u32 disRateMask ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#169: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:169: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#207: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:207: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#234: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:234: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#260: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:260: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#288: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:288: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#317: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:317: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_QueryBtInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#334: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:334: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_MonitorBtCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#395: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:395: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_MonitorWiFiCtr(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#481: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:481: +static bool halbtc8723b1ant_IsWifiStatusChanged(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#516: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:516: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_UpdateBtLinkInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#518: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:518: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#580: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:580: +static u8 halbtc8723b1ant_ActionAlgorithm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#582: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:582: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#808: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:808: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#836: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:836: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bLowPenaltyRa ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#853: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:853: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#890: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:890: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#933: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:933: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#991: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:991: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1012: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1012: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bEnable ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1046: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1046: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" torvalds#1057: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1057: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1108: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1108: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bLowPenaltyRA ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1121: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1121: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 antPosType, bool bInitHwCfg, bool bWifiOff ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1124: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1124: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1310: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1310: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 byte1, u8 byte2, u8 byte3, u8 byte4, u8 byte5 ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1364: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1364: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bForceExec, bool bTurnOn, u8 type ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1367: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1367: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1664: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1664: +static bool halbtc8723b1ant_IsCommonAction(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1755: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1755: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1944: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1944: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bNewPsState ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #1966: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:1966: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 psType, u8 lpsVal, u8 rpwmVal ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2014: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2014: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiMultiPort(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2022: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2022: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionHs(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2028: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2028: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionBtInquiry(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2030: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2030: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2070: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2070: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2073: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2073: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2090: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2090: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 wifiStatus ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2095: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2095: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2144: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2144: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiNotConnected(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2155: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2155: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2158: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2158: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2189: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2189: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2192: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2192: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2213: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2213: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiConnectedScan(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2215: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2215: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2246: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2246: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2249: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2249: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2270: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2270: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_ActionWifiConnected(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2390: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2390: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_RunSwCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2449: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2449: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_RunCoexistMechanism(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2451: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2451: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2582: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2582: +static void halbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2596: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2596: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2651: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2651: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PowerOnSetting(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2653: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2653: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2703: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2703: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitHwConfig(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, bool bWifiOnly) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2708: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2708: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_InitCoexDm(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2723: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2723: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_DisplayCoexInfo(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2725: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2725: + struct BTC_BOARD_INFO * pBoardInfo = &pBtCoexist->boardInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2726: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2726: + struct BTC_STACK_INFO * pStackInfo = &pBtCoexist->stackInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #2727: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:2727: + struct BTC_BT_LINK_INFO * pBtLinkInfo = &pBtCoexist->btLinkInfo; ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3186: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3186: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_IpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3212: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3212: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_LpsNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3230: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3230: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ScanNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3320: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3320: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_ConnectNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3377: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3377: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_MediaStatusNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3447: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3447: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_SpecialPacketNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 type) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3536: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3536: + struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 *tmpBuf, u8 length ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3701: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3701: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_HaltNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3716: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3716: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_PnpNotify(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist, u8 pnpState) ERROR:POINTER_LOCATION: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar" #3738: FILE: ./hal/HalBtc8723b1Ant.c:3738: +void EXhalbtc8723b1ant_Periodical(struct BTC_COEXIST * pBtCoexist) Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marco Cesati <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
docs: rust: documentation review
PD#151225: driver defect clean up: torvalds#228 torvalds#262 torvalds#354 torvalds#407 torvalds#442 torvalds#445 torvalds#461 torvalds#576 torvalds#580 torvalds#598 torvalds#599 torvalds#615 torvalds#616 torvalds#671 torvalds#756 torvalds#760 torvalds#874 Change-Id: I1bc47c3e30ecfa1ca44e53f91201aa4e09ff19f5 Signed-off-by: Bencheng Jing <[email protected]>
PD#151225: driver defect clean up: torvalds#228 torvalds#262 torvalds#354 torvalds#407 torvalds#442 torvalds#445 torvalds#461 torvalds#576 torvalds#580 torvalds#598 torvalds#599 torvalds#615 torvalds#616 torvalds#671 torvalds#756 torvalds#760 torvalds#874 Change-Id: I1bc47c3e30ecfa1ca44e53f91201aa4e09ff19f5 Signed-off-by: Bencheng Jing <[email protected]>
Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
[ Upstream commit b4cafb3 ] Netdevsim triggers a splat on reload, when it destroys regions with snapshots pending: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 787 at net/core/devlink.c:6291 devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 CPU: 1 PID: 787 Comm: devlink Not tainted 6.1.0-07460-g7ae9888d6e1c torvalds#580 RIP: 0010:devlink_region_snapshot_del+0x12e/0x140 Call Trace: <TASK> devl_region_destroy+0x70/0x140 nsim_dev_reload_down+0x2f/0x60 [netdevsim] devlink_reload+0x1f7/0x360 devlink_nl_cmd_reload+0x6ce/0x860 genl_family_rcv_msg_doit.isra.0+0x145/0x1c0 This is the locking assert in devlink_region_snapshot_del(), we're supposed to be holding the region->snapshot_lock here. Fixes: 2dec18a ("net: devlink: remove region snapshots list dependency on devlink->lock") Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
To make README more friendly and provides link for beginners.