-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove unresolved cache limit of 10 #324
Open
kopren
wants to merge
1
commit into
torvalds:master
Choose a base branch
from
kopren:patch-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The maximum number of unresolved multicast groups in the Multicast Routing Table (MRT) is limited to 10 or less within the ipmr_cache_unresolved function. The unresolved cache is flushed and what seems to be a statically random set of 10 or less unresolved multicast groups are rebuilt in the MRT every jiffies+HZ/10. In an environment where there are a great deal more than 10 multicast source streams and only a few are actually joined a great deal more than 10 possible unresolved entries may exist and many cache_misses are encountered. A recompiled Linux kernel, using this patch quickly creates multicast routes from a complete cache of unresolved entries. The 10 unresolved cache limit results in a denial of service, if a host sends 20 or greater streams to an interface serviced by pimd (ie if a host sends 100 multicast streams, there is a 1 in 10 chance that a cache hit would be encountered with the existing code.)
laijs
pushed a commit
to laijs/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 16, 2017
lkl: timeout dhcp request ealier if not available
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 16, 2018
WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#250: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4554: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#251: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4555: + .name = "cpu.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#251: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4555: + .name = "cpu.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#252: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4556: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#252: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4556: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#253: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4557: + .seq_show = cgroup_cpu_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#253: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4557: + .seq_show = cgroup_cpu_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#254: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4558: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#255: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4559: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#256: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4560: + .name = "memory.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#256: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4560: + .name = "memory.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#257: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4561: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#257: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4561: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#258: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4562: + .seq_show = cgroup_memory_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#258: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4562: + .seq_show = cgroup_memory_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#259: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4563: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#260: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4564: + {$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#261: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4565: + .name = "io.pressure",$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#261: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4565: + .name = "io.pressure",$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#262: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4566: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#262: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4566: + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#263: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4567: + .seq_show = cgroup_io_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#263: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4567: + .seq_show = cgroup_io_pressure_show,$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#264: FILE: kernel/cgroup/cgroup.c:4568: + },$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#322: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:424: + cgroup = task->cgroups->dfl_cgrp;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#323: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:425: + while (cgroup && (parent = cgroup_parent(cgroup))) {$ WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (7, 15) torvalds#323: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:425: + while (cgroup && (parent = cgroup_parent(cgroup))) { + struct psi_group *group; ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#324: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:426: + struct psi_group *group;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#324: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:426: + struct psi_group *group;$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#326: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:428: + group = cgroup_psi(cgroup);$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#326: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:428: + group = cgroup_psi(cgroup);$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#327: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:429: + psi_group_change(group, cpu, now, clear, set);$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#327: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:429: + psi_group_change(group, cpu, now, clear, set);$ ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible torvalds#329: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:431: + cgroup = parent;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#329: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:431: + cgroup = parent;$ WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line torvalds#330: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:432: + }$ WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for any arm of this statement torvalds#378: FILE: kernel/sched/psi.c:537: + if (task_on_rq_queued(task)) { [...] + } else if (task->in_iowait) { [...] total: 13 errors, 24 warnings, 334 lines checked NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace. NOTE: Whitespace errors detected. You may wish to use scripts/cleanpatch or scripts/cleanfile ./patches/psi-cgroup-support.patch has style problems, please review. NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS. Please run checkpatch prior to sending patches Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 8, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
roxell
pushed a commit
to roxell/linux
that referenced
this pull request
May 10, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
ojeda
added a commit
to ojeda/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 3, 2021
rust: check range and add type invariant to Error (issue torvalds#295)
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 28, 2021
…format For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]>
intersectRaven
pushed a commit
to intersectRaven/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 torvalds#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
damentz
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 #311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 #314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 19, 2021
…format [ Upstream commit 06d213d ] For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent. Before fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 #2196 [hci0] 321.342548 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 #2197 [hci0] 321.343585 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17 #2198 [hci0] 321.351666 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) ........ > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2336 [hci0] 321.383655 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2337 [hci0] 321.389558 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2338 [hci0] 321.393615 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2339 [hci0] 321.393618 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2340 [hci0] 321.393618 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2341 [hci0] 321.397070 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2342 [hci0] 321.403622 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2343 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2344 [hci0] 321.403625 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2345 [hci0] 321.403625 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2346 [hci0] 321.404569 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2347 [hci0] 321.412091 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2348 [hci0] 321.413626 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2349 [hci0] 321.413630 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48 #2350 [hci0] 321.413630 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 #2351 [hci0] 321.419674 After fix: < HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21 linux-sunxi#309 [hci0] 49.439693 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Transmit bandwidth: 8000 Receive bandwidth: 8000 Max latency: 13 Setting: 0x0003 Input Coding: Linear Input Data Format: 1's complement Input Sample Size: 8-bit # of bits padding at MSB: 0 Air Coding Format: Transparent Data Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02) Packet type: 0x003f HV1 may be used HV2 may be used HV3 may be used EV3 may be used EV4 may be used EV5 may be used > HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4 torvalds#310 [hci0] 49.440308 Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1 Status: Success (0x00) > HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17 torvalds#311 [hci0] 49.449308 Status: Success (0x00) Handle: 257 Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd) Link type: eSCO (0x02) Transmission interval: 0x0c Retransmission window: 0x04 RX packet length: 60 TX packet length: 60 Air mode: Transparent (0x03) < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#312 [hci0] 49.450421 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#313 [hci0] 49.457927 > HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3 torvalds#314 [hci0] 49.460345 Handle: 256 Max slots: 5 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#315 [hci0] 49.465453 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#316 [hci0] 49.470502 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#317 [hci0] 49.470519 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#318 [hci0] 49.472996 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#319 [hci0] 49.480412 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#320 [hci0] 49.480492 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#321 [hci0] 49.487989 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#322 [hci0] 49.490303 < SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#323 [hci0] 49.495496 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#324 [hci0] 49.500304 > SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60 torvalds#325 [hci0] 49.500311 Signed-off-by: Kiran K <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
staging-kernelci-org
pushed a commit
to kernelci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 23, 2021
I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
roxell
pushed a commit
to roxell/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 27, 2021
I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
fengguang
pushed a commit
to 0day-ci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 1, 2021
I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
damentz
referenced
this pull request
in zen-kernel/zen-kernel
Nov 17, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ #324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
staging-kernelci-org
pushed a commit
to kernelci/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
steev
pushed a commit
to steev/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 18, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
repojohnray
pushed a commit
to repojohnray/linux-sunxi-4.7.y
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 19, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 21, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 25, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
ammarfaizi2
pushed a commit
to ammarfaizi2/linux-fork
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 26, 2021
[ Upstream commit 1030d68 ] I've got the following splat after enabling preemption: [ 3.724721] BUG: using __this_cpu_add() in preemptible [00000000] code: swapper/0/1 [ 3.734630] caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.740635] CPU: 1 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc4-64bit+ torvalds#324 [ 3.744605] Hardware name: 9000/785/C8000 [ 3.744605] Backtrace: [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d9d58>] show_stack+0x74/0xb0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27bd4>] dump_stack_lvl+0x10c/0x188 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c27c84>] dump_stack+0x34/0x48 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33438>] check_preemption_disabled+0x178/0x1b0 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c334f8>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x38/0x50 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d632c>] flush_tlb_all+0x58/0x2e0 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401075c0>] 0x401075c0 [ 3.744605] [<000000004010b8fc>] 0x4010b8fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401080fc>] 0x401080fc [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d5224>] do_one_initcall+0x128/0x378 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040102de8>] 0x40102de8 [ 3.744605] [<0000000040c33864>] kernel_init+0x60/0x3a8 [ 3.744605] [<00000000401d1020>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x20/0x28 [ 3.744605] Fix this by moving the __inc_irq_stat() into the locked section. Signed-off-by: Sven Schnelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Helge Deller <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 13, 2022
Don't pass nr_bits as arg1, cpu_max_bits_warn would cause warning now. ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at include/linux/cpumask.h:110 __netif_set_xps_queue+0x14e/0x770 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc4-00018-g854701ba4c39 torvalds#324 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : __netif_set_xps_queue+0x14e/0x770 ra : __netif_set_xps_queue+0x552/0x770 epc : ffffffff806fe448 ra : ffffffff806fe84c sp : ff600000023279d0 gp : ffffffff815fff88 tp : ff600000023a0000 t0 : ff6000000308ab40 t1 : 0000000000000003 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff60000002327a90 s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff6000000308ab00 a1 : ff6000000308ab00 a2 : ff6000000308a8e8 a3 : 0000000000000004 a4 : 0000000000000000 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000000 s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : ff60000002327aa0 s5 : ffffffff816031c8 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000001 s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000004 s10: ff6000000308a8c0 s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 0000000000000014 t5 : 0000000000000000 t6 : 0000000000000000 status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [<ffffffff805e5824>] virtnet_set_affinity+0x14a/0x1c0 [<ffffffff805e7b04>] virtnet_probe+0x7fc/0xee2 [<ffffffff8050e120>] virtio_dev_probe+0x164/0x2de [<ffffffff8055b69e>] really_probe+0x82/0x224 [<ffffffff8055b89a>] __driver_probe_device+0x5a/0xaa [<ffffffff8055b916>] driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xb8 [<ffffffff8055bf34>] __driver_attach+0x76/0x108 [<ffffffff805597c0>] bus_for_each_dev+0x4a/0x8e [<ffffffff8055b072>] driver_attach+0x1a/0x28 [<ffffffff8055ab8c>] bus_add_driver+0x13c/0x1a6 [<ffffffff8055c722>] driver_register+0x4a/0xfc [<ffffffff8050dc34>] register_virtio_driver+0x1c/0x2c [<ffffffff80a2bae4>] virtio_net_driver_init+0x7a/0xb0 [<ffffffff80002840>] do_one_initcall+0x66/0x2e4 [<ffffffff80a01212>] kernel_init_freeable+0x28a/0x304 [<ffffffff808b21e2>] kernel_init+0x1e/0x110 [<ffffffff80003c46>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 944c417 ("net: fix cpu_max_bits_warn() usage in netif_attrmask_next{,_and}") Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 14, 2022
Don't pass nr_bits as arg1, cpu_max_bits_warn would cause warning now 854701b ("net: fix cpu_max_bits_warn() usage in netif_attrmask_next{,_and}"). ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 1 at include/linux/cpumask.h:110 __netif_set_xps_queue+0x14e/0x770 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.0.0-rc4-00018-g854701ba4c39 torvalds#324 Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) epc : __netif_set_xps_queue+0x14e/0x770 ra : __netif_set_xps_queue+0x552/0x770 epc : ffffffff806fe448 ra : ffffffff806fe84c sp : ff600000023279d0 gp : ffffffff815fff88 tp : ff600000023a0000 t0 : ff6000000308ab40 t1 : 0000000000000003 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ff60000002327a90 s1 : 0000000000000000 a0 : ff6000000308ab00 a1 : ff6000000308ab00 a2 : ff6000000308a8e8 a3 : 0000000000000004 a4 : 0000000000000000 a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 : 0000000000000000 s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : 0000000000000000 s4 : ff60000002327aa0 s5 : ffffffff816031c8 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 : 0000000000000001 s8 : 0000000000000000 s9 : 0000000000000004 s10: ff6000000308a8c0 s11: 0000000000000004 t3 : 0000000000000000 t4 : 0000000000000014 t5 : 0000000000000000 t6 : 0000000000000000 status: 0000000200000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003 [<ffffffff805e5824>] virtnet_set_affinity+0x14a/0x1c0 [<ffffffff805e7b04>] virtnet_probe+0x7fc/0xee2 [<ffffffff8050e120>] virtio_dev_probe+0x164/0x2de [<ffffffff8055b69e>] really_probe+0x82/0x224 [<ffffffff8055b89a>] __driver_probe_device+0x5a/0xaa [<ffffffff8055b916>] driver_probe_device+0x2c/0xb8 [<ffffffff8055bf34>] __driver_attach+0x76/0x108 [<ffffffff805597c0>] bus_for_each_dev+0x4a/0x8e [<ffffffff8055b072>] driver_attach+0x1a/0x28 [<ffffffff8055ab8c>] bus_add_driver+0x13c/0x1a6 [<ffffffff8055c722>] driver_register+0x4a/0xfc [<ffffffff8050dc34>] register_virtio_driver+0x1c/0x2c [<ffffffff80a2bae4>] virtio_net_driver_init+0x7a/0xb0 [<ffffffff80002840>] do_one_initcall+0x66/0x2e4 [<ffffffff80a01212>] kernel_init_freeable+0x28a/0x304 [<ffffffff808b21e2>] kernel_init+0x1e/0x110 [<ffffffff80003c46>] ret_from_exception+0x0/0x10 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Fixes: 80d1966 ("net: Refactor XPS for CPUs and Rx queues") Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 4, 2022
The UDC is not a suitable parent of the net device as the UDC can change or vanish during the lifecycle of the ethernet gadget. This can be illustrated with the following: mkdir -p /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/mygadget cd /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/mygadget mkdir -p configs/c.1/strings/0x409 echo "C1:Composite Device" > configs/c.1/strings/0x409/configuration mkdir -p functions/ecm.usb0 ln -s functions/ecm.usb0 configs/c.1/ echo "dummy_udc.0" > UDC rmmod dummy_hcd The 'rmmod' removes the UDC from the just created gadget, leaving the still existing net device with a no longer existing parent. Accessing the ethernet device with commands like: ip --details link show usb0 will result in a KASAN splat: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in if_nlmsg_size+0x3e8/0x528 Read of size 4 at addr c5c84754 by task ip/357 CPU: 3 PID: 357 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3-00013-gd14953726b24-dirty torvalds#324 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x134/0x4d4 print_report from kasan_report+0x78/0x10c kasan_report from if_nlmsg_size+0x3e8/0x528 if_nlmsg_size from rtnl_getlink+0x2b4/0x4d0 rtnl_getlink from rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1f4/0x674 rtnetlink_rcv_msg from netlink_rcv_skb+0xb4/0x1f8 netlink_rcv_skb from netlink_unicast+0x294/0x478 netlink_unicast from netlink_sendmsg+0x328/0x640 netlink_sendmsg from ____sys_sendmsg+0x2a4/0x3b4 ____sys_sendmsg from ___sys_sendmsg+0xc8/0x12c ___sys_sendmsg from sys_sendmsg+0xa0/0x120 sys_sendmsg from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Solve this by not setting the parent of the ethernet device. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 9, 2022
The UDC is not a suitable parent of the net device as the UDC can change or vanish during the lifecycle of the ethernet gadget. This can be illustrated with the following: mkdir -p /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/mygadget cd /sys/kernel/config/usb_gadget/mygadget mkdir -p configs/c.1/strings/0x409 echo "C1:Composite Device" > configs/c.1/strings/0x409/configuration mkdir -p functions/ecm.usb0 ln -s functions/ecm.usb0 configs/c.1/ echo "dummy_udc.0" > UDC rmmod dummy_hcd The 'rmmod' removes the UDC from the just created gadget, leaving the still existing net device with a no longer existing parent. Accessing the ethernet device with commands like: ip --details link show usb0 will result in a KASAN splat: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in if_nlmsg_size+0x3e8/0x528 Read of size 4 at addr c5c84754 by task ip/357 CPU: 3 PID: 357 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.1.0-rc3-00013-gd14953726b24-dirty torvalds#324 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX6 Quad/DualLite (Device Tree) unwind_backtrace from show_stack+0x10/0x14 show_stack from dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x70 dump_stack_lvl from print_report+0x134/0x4d4 print_report from kasan_report+0x78/0x10c kasan_report from if_nlmsg_size+0x3e8/0x528 if_nlmsg_size from rtnl_getlink+0x2b4/0x4d0 rtnl_getlink from rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x1f4/0x674 rtnetlink_rcv_msg from netlink_rcv_skb+0xb4/0x1f8 netlink_rcv_skb from netlink_unicast+0x294/0x478 netlink_unicast from netlink_sendmsg+0x328/0x640 netlink_sendmsg from ____sys_sendmsg+0x2a4/0x3b4 ____sys_sendmsg from ___sys_sendmsg+0xc8/0x12c ___sys_sendmsg from sys_sendmsg+0xa0/0x120 sys_sendmsg from ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x1c Solve this by not setting the parent of the ethernet device. Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
rpardini
pushed a commit
to rpardini/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2023
Add "mem=0x40000000" to COMMAND LINE, kernel will crash: [ 18.379633][ T35] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffff01d7c000 [ 18.380412][ T35] Mem abort info: [ 18.380726][ T35] ESR = 0x96000006 [ 18.381060][ T35] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 18.381587][ T35] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 18.381920][ T35] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 18.382264][ T35] Data abort info: [ 18.382585][ T35] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006 [ 18.383029][ T35] CM = 0, WnR = 0 [ 18.383360][ T35] swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000001c47000 [ 18.384014][ T35] [ffffffff01d7c000] pgd=0000000040f2f003, p4d=0000000040f2f003, pud=0000000040f2f003, pmd=0000000000000000 [ 18.385299][ T35] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 18.385862][ T35] Modules linked in: [ 18.386205][ T35] CPU: 2 PID: 35 Comm: kworker/2:1 Not tainted 5.10.110 torvalds#324 [ 18.386843][ T35] Hardware name: Rockchip RK3568 EVB1 DDR4 V10 Board (DT) [ 18.387470][ T35] Workqueue: events rockchip_drm_fb_destroy_work [ 18.388026][ T35] pstate: 80c00009 (Nzcv daif +PAN +UAO -TCO BTYPE=--) [ 18.388626][ T35] pc : rockchip_free_loader_memory+0x100/0x1a0 [ 18.389156][ T35] lr : rockchip_free_loader_memory+0xc8/0x1a0 [ 18.389683][ T35] sp : ffffffc0125abd00 [ 18.390039][ T35] x29: ffffffc0125abd00 x28: 0000000000001000 [ 18.390570][ T35] x27: ffffff807df00000 x26: 0000008000000000 [ 18.391099][ T35] x25: fffffffeffe00000 x24: 0000000000000001 [ 18.391628][ T35] x23: ffffff80043d6300 x22: ffffff807df00000 [ 18.392157][ T35] x21: ffffff807dfb7000 x20: ffffff80043a8480 [ 18.392686][ T35] x19: ffffffff01d7c000 x18: 0000000000000000 [ 18.393215][ T35] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 [ 18.393744][ T35] x15: 00000072e03fbb78 x14: 0000000000000000 [ 18.394273][ T35] x13: 000000000000003d x12: 0000000000000000 [ 18.394802][ T35] x11: 00000000fffffff6 x10: ffffffc0122f8000 [ 18.395330][ T35] x9 : 0000000000010000 x8 : 0000000000000008 [ 18.395859][ T35] x7 : 0000000000818000 x6 : ffffff801ad909f0 [ 18.396387][ T35] x5 : 0000000000000039 x4 : ffffffc0122d01b8 [ 18.396917][ T35] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000000 [ 18.397445][ T35] x1 : ffffff80032622d8 x0 : 0000000000001000 [ 18.397975][ T35] Call trace: [ 18.398255][ T35] rockchip_free_loader_memory+0x100/0x1a0 [ 18.398762][ T35] __rockchip_drm_fb_destroy+0xa4/0xc8 [ 18.399233][ T35] rockchip_drm_fb_destroy_work+0x14/0x20 [ 18.399728][ T35] process_one_work+0x1b0/0x490 [ 18.400142][ T35] worker_thread+0x4c/0x3f8 [ 18.400534][ T35] kthread+0x140/0x160 [ 18.400882][ T35] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x30 Logo buffer allocated from Uboot which may removed in kernel for any purpose such as "debug". So, before freeing to the buddy system, we must check if the buffer are valid. Change-Id: I9a27c4552a3c7f450b034d2a6c6c3a321bb2fc54 Signed-off-by: Simon Xue <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 21, 2023
Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from BPF test_progs selftests: # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap torvalds#115/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK torvalds#115/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK torvalds#115 ldsx_insn:OK torvalds#302/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK torvalds#302/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK torvalds#302/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK torvalds#302/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK torvalds#302 verifier_bswap:OK torvalds#316/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK torvalds#316/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK torvalds#316 verifier_gotol:OK torvalds#324/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK torvalds#324/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK torvalds#324/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK torvalds#324/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK torvalds#324/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK torvalds#324/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK torvalds#324/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK torvalds#324 verifier_ldsx:OK torvalds#335/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK torvalds#335/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK torvalds#335/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK torvalds#335/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK torvalds#335/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK torvalds#335/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK torvalds#335/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK torvalds#335/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK torvalds#335/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK torvalds#335/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK torvalds#335 verifier_movsx:OK torvalds#347/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK torvalds#347/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK torvalds#347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK torvalds#347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK torvalds#347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK torvalds#347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK torvalds#347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK torvalds#347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK torvalds#347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK torvalds#347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK torvalds#347 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Tested-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2023
…l info When the chip not support 6GHz capability, the channels of 6GHz information should not be updated. May get the stacktrace without this patch. <1>[ 19.442078] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000014 <1>[ 19.457535] Mem abort info: <1>[ 19.465329] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 <1>[ 19.473295] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits <1>[ 19.482354] SET = 0, FnV = 0 <1>[ 19.489143] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 <1>[ 19.495991] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault <1>[ 19.504554] Data abort info: <1>[ 19.511111] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 <1>[ 19.520269] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 <1>[ 19.528988] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 <1>[ 19.537960] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001027a9000 <1>[ 19.548014] [0000000000000014] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=000000000000 <0>[ 19.558429] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP <4>[ 19.568270] Modules linked in: mt7921e mt7921_common mt792x_lib mt76_connac_lib mt76 mac80211 btusb btintel cfg80211 btmtk snd_sof_ipc_msg_ btrtl snd_sof_ipc_flood_test btbcm bluetooth snd_sof_mt8195 uvcvideo mtk_adsp_common snd_sof_xtensa_dsp uvc snd_sof_of snd_sof videobuf2_vmalloc ecdh_generic ecc snd_sof_utils cros_ec_lid_angle cros_ec_sensors crct10dif_ cros_ec_sensors_core cros_usbpd_logger crypto_user fuse ip_tables ipv6 <4>[ 19.614237] CPU: 1 PID: 105 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6-next-20231017+ torvalds#324 <4>[ 19.625957] Hardware name: Acer Tomato (rev2) board (DT) <4>[ 19.634970] Workqueue: events mt7921_init_work [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.644522] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTY <4>[ 19.655182] pc : mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.664983] lr : mt7921_regd_notifier+0xd4/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.674679] sp : ffff800080acba80 <4>[ 19.681649] x29: ffff800080acba80 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff4faf <4>[ 19.692483] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff4faf <4>[ 19.703294] x23: 00000000ffffe926 x22: ffff4faf16031fa0 x21: 00000000 <4>[ 19.714108] x20: 000000000000001c x19: ffff4faf16ba6f40 x18: 00000000 <4>[ 19.724928] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffac6b891c2750 x15: ffff8000 <4>[ 19.735722] x14: 0000000000000180 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000 <4>[ 19.746478] x11: 0000000000000002 x10: ffff4faf01c21780 x9 : ffffac6b <4>[ 19.757214] x8 : 00000000006c0000 x7 : ffffac6b6b020cf0 x6 : ffffac6b <4>[ 19.767945] x5 : ffffac6b6b020d00 x4 : ffffac6b6b020cf8 x3 : ffff4faf <4>[ 19.778648] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 000000000000001c x0 : 00000000 <4>[ 19.789366] Call trace: <4>[ 19.795381] mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.804675] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x2bc/0xa08 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.813864] wiphy_regulatory_register+0x4c/0x88 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.823029] wiphy_register+0x75c/0x8d0 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.831446] ieee80211_register_hw+0x70c/0xc10 [mac80211] <4>[ 19.840479] mt76_register_device+0x168/0x2e8 [mt76] <4>[ 19.849008] mt7921_init_work+0xdc/0x250 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.857817] process_one_work+0x148/0x3c0 <4>[ 19.865292] worker_thread+0x32c/0x450 <4>[ 19.872489] kthread+0x11c/0x128 <4>[ 19.879173] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 <0>[ 19.886153] Code: f0000041 9100a021 94000aef aa0003f9 (b9401780) <4>[ 19.895634] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Reported-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Fixes: 09382d8 ("mt7921: update the channel usage when the regd domain changed") Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2023
…l info When the chip not support 6GHz capability, the channels of 6GHz information should not be updated. May get the stacktrace without this patch. <1>[ 19.442078] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000014 <1>[ 19.457535] Mem abort info: <1>[ 19.465329] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 <1>[ 19.473295] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits <1>[ 19.482354] SET = 0, FnV = 0 <1>[ 19.489143] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 <1>[ 19.495991] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault <1>[ 19.504554] Data abort info: <1>[ 19.511111] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 <1>[ 19.520269] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 <1>[ 19.528988] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 <1>[ 19.537960] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001027a9000 <1>[ 19.548014] [0000000000000014] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=000000000000 <0>[ 19.558429] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP <4>[ 19.568270] Modules linked in: mt7921e mt7921_common mt792x_lib mt76_connac_lib mt76 mac80211 btusb btintel cfg80211 btmtk snd_sof_ipc_msg_ btrtl snd_sof_ipc_flood_test btbcm bluetooth snd_sof_mt8195 uvcvideo mtk_adsp_common snd_sof_xtensa_dsp uvc snd_sof_of snd_sof videobuf2_vmalloc ecdh_generic ecc snd_sof_utils cros_ec_lid_angle cros_ec_sensors crct10dif_ cros_ec_sensors_core cros_usbpd_logger crypto_user fuse ip_tables ipv6 <4>[ 19.614237] CPU: 1 PID: 105 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6-next-20231017+ torvalds#324 <4>[ 19.625957] Hardware name: Acer Tomato (rev2) board (DT) <4>[ 19.634970] Workqueue: events mt7921_init_work [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.644522] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTY <4>[ 19.655182] pc : mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.664983] lr : mt7921_regd_notifier+0xd4/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.674679] sp : ffff800080acba80 <4>[ 19.681649] x29: ffff800080acba80 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff4faf <4>[ 19.692483] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff4faf <4>[ 19.703294] x23: 00000000ffffe926 x22: ffff4faf16031fa0 x21: 00000000 <4>[ 19.714108] x20: 000000000000001c x19: ffff4faf16ba6f40 x18: 00000000 <4>[ 19.724928] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffac6b891c2750 x15: ffff8000 <4>[ 19.735722] x14: 0000000000000180 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000 <4>[ 19.746478] x11: 0000000000000002 x10: ffff4faf01c21780 x9 : ffffac6b <4>[ 19.757214] x8 : 00000000006c0000 x7 : ffffac6b6b020cf0 x6 : ffffac6b <4>[ 19.767945] x5 : ffffac6b6b020d00 x4 : ffffac6b6b020cf8 x3 : ffff4faf <4>[ 19.778648] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 000000000000001c x0 : 00000000 <4>[ 19.789366] Call trace: <4>[ 19.795381] mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.804675] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x2bc/0xa08 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.813864] wiphy_regulatory_register+0x4c/0x88 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.823029] wiphy_register+0x75c/0x8d0 [cfg80211] <4>[ 19.831446] ieee80211_register_hw+0x70c/0xc10 [mac80211] <4>[ 19.840479] mt76_register_device+0x168/0x2e8 [mt76] <4>[ 19.849008] mt7921_init_work+0xdc/0x250 [mt7921_common] <4>[ 19.857817] process_one_work+0x148/0x3c0 <4>[ 19.865292] worker_thread+0x32c/0x450 <4>[ 19.872489] kthread+0x11c/0x128 <4>[ 19.879173] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 <0>[ 19.886153] Code: f0000041 9100a021 94000aef aa0003f9 (b9401780) <4>[ 19.895634] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Reported-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Fixes: 09382d8 ("mt7921: update the channel usage when the regd domain changed") Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]>
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 24, 2023
…l info When the chip not support 6GHz capability, the channels of 6GHz information should not be updated. This caused a crash: [ 19.442078] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000014 [ 19.457535] Mem abort info: [ 19.465329] ESR = 0x0000000096000004 [ 19.473295] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits [ 19.482354] SET = 0, FnV = 0 [ 19.489143] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 [ 19.495991] FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault [ 19.504554] Data abort info: [ 19.511111] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 [ 19.520269] CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 [ 19.528988] GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 [ 19.537960] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=00000001027a9000 [ 19.548014] [0000000000000014] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=000000000000 [ 19.558429] Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP [ 19.568270] Modules linked in: mt7921e mt7921_common mt792x_lib mt76_connac_lib mt76 mac80211 btusb btintel cfg80211 btmtk snd_sof_ipc_msg_ btrtl snd_sof_ipc_flood_test btbcm bluetooth snd_sof_mt8195 uvcvideo mtk_adsp_common snd_sof_xtensa_dsp uvc snd_sof_of snd_sof videobuf2_vmalloc ecdh_generic ecc snd_sof_utils cros_ec_lid_angle cros_ec_sensors crct10dif_ cros_ec_sensors_core cros_usbpd_logger crypto_user fuse ip_tables ipv6 [ 19.614237] CPU: 1 PID: 105 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 6.6.0-rc6-next-20231017+ torvalds#324 [ 19.625957] Hardware name: Acer Tomato (rev2) board (DT) [ 19.634970] Workqueue: events mt7921_init_work [mt7921_common] [ 19.644522] pstate: 60400009 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTY [ 19.655182] pc : mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] [ 19.664983] lr : mt7921_regd_notifier+0xd4/0x290 [mt7921_common] [ 19.674679] sp : ffff800080acba80 [ 19.681649] x29: ffff800080acba80 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: ffff4faf [ 19.692483] x26: 0000000000000000 x25: 0000000000000000 x24: ffff4faf [ 19.703294] x23: 00000000ffffe926 x22: ffff4faf16031fa0 x21: 00000000 [ 19.714108] x20: 000000000000001c x19: ffff4faf16ba6f40 x18: 00000000 [ 19.724928] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: ffffac6b891c2750 x15: ffff8000 [ 19.735722] x14: 0000000000000180 x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000 [ 19.746478] x11: 0000000000000002 x10: ffff4faf01c21780 x9 : ffffac6b [ 19.757214] x8 : 00000000006c0000 x7 : ffffac6b6b020cf0 x6 : ffffac6b [ 19.767945] x5 : ffffac6b6b020d00 x4 : ffffac6b6b020cf8 x3 : ffff4faf [ 19.778648] x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 000000000000001c x0 : 00000000 [ 19.789366] Call trace: [ 19.795381] mt7921_regd_notifier+0x180/0x290 [mt7921_common] [ 19.804675] wiphy_update_regulatory+0x2bc/0xa08 [cfg80211] [ 19.813864] wiphy_regulatory_register+0x4c/0x88 [cfg80211] [ 19.823029] wiphy_register+0x75c/0x8d0 [cfg80211] [ 19.831446] ieee80211_register_hw+0x70c/0xc10 [mac80211] [ 19.840479] mt76_register_device+0x168/0x2e8 [mt76] [ 19.849008] mt7921_init_work+0xdc/0x250 [mt7921_common] [ 19.857817] process_one_work+0x148/0x3c0 [ 19.865292] worker_thread+0x32c/0x450 [ 19.872489] kthread+0x11c/0x128 [ 19.879173] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 [ 19.886153] Code: f0000041 9100a021 94000aef aa0003f9 (b9401780) [ 19.895634] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- Reported-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Fixes: 09382d8 ("wifi: mt76: mt7921: update the channel usage when the regd domain changed") Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <[email protected]> Tested-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/cf77a58a60d81c77a28388bc8d312b87ffb48434.1697603002.git.deren.wu@mediatek.com
intel-lab-lkp
pushed a commit
to intel-lab-lkp/linux
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 13, 2024
The routine bluefield_edac_mc_probe() has an extra empty line, so it must be removed. This extra line is flagged when running "scripts/checkpatch --strict": CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary before a close brace '}' torvalds#324: FILE: drivers/edac/bluefield_edac.c:324: + +} Signed-off-by: David Thompson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Shravan Kumar Ramani <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The maximum number of unresolved multicast groups in the Multicast Routing Table (MRT) is limited to 10 or less within the ipmr_cache_unresolved function. The unresolved cache is flushed and what seems to be a statically random set of 10 or less unresolved multicast groups are rebuilt in the MRT every jiffies+HZ/10. In an environment where there are a great deal more than 10 multicast source streams and only a few are actually joined a great deal more than 10 possible unresolved entries may exist and many cache_misses are encountered. A recompiled Linux kernel, using this patch quickly creates multicast routes from a complete cache of unresolved entries. The 10 unresolved cache limit results in a denial of service, if a host sends 20 or greater streams to an interface serviced by pimd (ie if a host sends 100 multicast streams, there is a 1 in 10 chance that a cache hit would be encountered with the existing code.)