Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deployment: Smithery config #488

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

calclavia
Copy link
Contributor

@calclavia calclavia commented Jan 30, 2025

This pull request introduces the following updates:

  • Smithery Configuration: Adds a Smithery YAML file, which specifies how to start the MCP and the configuration options it supports. It allows you to deploy your MCP to Smithery, serving it over WebSockets so end-users do not need to install additional dependencies. To deploy, merge this PR, then visit your server page and click "Deploy" under the deployments page.
  • README: Updates the README to include installation instructions via Smithery. Note that the installation only works after the server is deployed on Smithery.

Please review these updates to verify their accuracy for your server and feel free to customize it to your needs. Let me know if you have any questions. 🙂

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Added a new section titled "Deployment at Scale (Modal)" in the README, providing a five-step guide for deploying the Cognee application.
  • Configuration

    • Enhanced Smithery configuration with a new startCommand section.
    • Introduced llmApiKey property in the configuration schema.
    • Added a commandFunction for generating the MCP startup command.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces updates to the project's documentation and configuration. The README.md file now includes a new section titled "Deployment at Scale (Modal)," outlining a five-step process for deploying the Cognee application using Modal's GPU-powered infrastructure. Additionally, the smithery.yaml configuration file has been enhanced with a new startCommand section, defining a configuration schema for LLM API key management and specifying how the Multi-Channel Processor (MCP) should be initiated.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md Added a new section "Deployment at Scale (Modal)" detailing steps for deploying Cognee using Modal.
smithery.yaml Added startCommand configuration with a type field, llmApiKey property in configSchema, and a commandFunction.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Modal
    participant Cognee

    User->>Modal: Create account and set API key
    User->>Cognee: Run deployment script
    Cognee-->>Modal: Deploy application
    Modal-->>User: Confirm deployment complete
Loading

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: implements modal wrapper + dockerfile for modal containers #469: The changes in this PR involve a Dockerfile and modal wrapper that are relevant to the "Deployment at Scale (Modal)" section added in the main PR's README.md, as both focus on deploying the Cognee application using Modal's infrastructure.
  • update readme #473: This PR also modifies the README.md, enhancing documentation related to the Cognee framework, which complements the new section added in the main PR about deploying the application.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where rabbits play,
Modal's magic helps us deploy today!
With steps so clear, we hop with glee,
Cognee's journey, as bright as can be!
Smithery's charm, a tale to tell,
Together we code, and all goes well! 🚀


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 11f9e95 and 25a152e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (14)
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: windows-latest
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_notebook_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_simple_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: run_dynamic_steps_example_test / test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: test
  • GitHub Check: profiler
  • GitHub Check: docker-compose-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

250-250: Enhance Modal deployment documentation.

While the deployment steps are clear, consider the following improvements:

  1. Change "4(+1)" to "5" for clarity
  2. Add prerequisites section (e.g., Python version, OS requirements)
  3. Include the content of modal_deployment.py or link to it
  4. Add example output or expected behavior

Let's verify if the modal_deployment.py file exists in the repository:


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

249-257: Add prerequisites and verify the installation command.

The new Smithery installation section should include:

  1. Prerequisites (e.g., Node.js version requirements)
  2. Expected outcome after installation
  3. Troubleshooting steps

Consider expanding the section with this additional information:

 ### Installing via Smithery
 
 To install Cognee for Claude Desktop automatically via [Smithery](https://smithery.ai/server/cognee):
 
+#### Prerequisites
+- Node.js 16 or higher
+- npm or npx
+
 ```bash
 npx -y @smithery/cli install cognee --client claude

+After installation, you should see Cognee listed in your Claude Desktop client.
+
+#### Troubleshooting
+If you encounter any issues during installation:
+1. Ensure you have the latest version of Node.js
+2. Try running with sudo if you encounter permission errors
+3. Check the Smithery logs at ~/.smithery/logs


</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**
**Plan: Pro**

<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a79f7133fddb375fc733c0144b9f1205d5b694df and 11f9e95e1e1480ee392e86f1f583605c5d932b36.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (2)</summary>

* `README.md` (1 hunks)
* `smithery.yaml` (1 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)</summary>

* GitHub Check: docker-compose-test

</details>

<details>
<summary>🔇 Additional comments (4)</summary><blockquote>

<details>
<summary>smithery.yaml (3)</summary>

`1-2`: **LGTM! Clear file header with documentation link.**

The header provides a clear reference to Smithery's configuration documentation.

---

`15-17`: **Verify the entrypoint script path and permissions.**

The commandFunction correctly sets up the environment, but we need to ensure:
1. The entrypoint script exists at the specified path
2. The script has proper execution permissions

<details>
<summary>✅ Verification successful</summary>

<!-- [monologue]
[task verify_entrypoint_1/1]
[observations]
1. Found entrypoint.sh in the root of the repository
2. Found multiple references to /app/entrypoint.sh:
   - In smithery.yaml as the command to execute
   - In Dockerfile with proper setup:
     - Copying to /app/entrypoint.sh
     - Setting executable permissions
     - Fixing line endings
     - Setting as ENTRYPOINT
[analysis]
The verification shows that:
1. The entrypoint script exists in the repository
2. The Dockerfile properly:
   - Copies it to the correct location (/app/entrypoint.sh)
   - Sets execution permissions (chmod +x)
   - Handles line endings for cross-platform compatibility
   - Uses it as the container's entrypoint
This confirms both requirements from the review comment:
1. Script existence ✓
2. Proper permissions ✓
[actions]
Generate a  response as all checks pass and the implementation is correct.
-->

**Entrypoint script setup is properly configured** ✓

The entrypoint script exists in the repository and the Dockerfile correctly:
- Copies it to `/app/entrypoint.sh`
- Sets execution permissions
- Handles line endings
- Uses it as the container's entrypoint



</details>

<details>
<summary>🏁 Scripts executed</summary>

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

```shell
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify entrypoint script existence and permissions

# Check if entrypoint.sh exists in the repository
fd "entrypoint.sh$"

# Check if there are any references to the entrypoint script in other files
rg "/app/entrypoint.sh"

Length of output: 353


3-14: Verify the security implications of LLM API key handling.

The configuration correctly defines the LLM API key requirement, but we should ensure secure handling:

  1. The API key is passed securely through environment variables
  2. The key is not logged or exposed in any way
  3. The schema properly validates the API key format
✅ Verification successful

API key handling implementation follows security best practices

The review confirms that the LLM API key is handled securely:

  • Properly passed through environment variables
  • No hardcoded credentials or key exposure in logs
  • Secure secrets management using AWS secrets for production
  • Appropriate validation of required credentials
  • Clear separation between development and production environments
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential security issues in API key handling

# Check if there's any logging of environment variables that might expose the API key
rg -i "log.*env|print.*env|debug.*env"

# Check for any files that might contain hardcoded API keys
rg -i "api[-_]?key.*=|api[-_]?key.*:" --type yaml --type env

Length of output: 65754


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for API key handling patterns

# Look for API key usage and validation
ast-grep --pattern 'llmApiKey|apiKey|api_key'

# Check for environment variable handling
rg -i "os\.environ|getenv|env\[|environment" -A 3 -B 3

# Look for logging patterns around API keys
rg -i "log|print|debug|console\.log" -A 2 -B 2

Length of output: 66618

README.md (1)

254-256: Verify the Smithery CLI package and command.

Let's verify:

  1. The existence and version of the Smithery CLI package
  2. The correct syntax for the installation command
✅ Verification successful

The Smithery CLI package exists and the command appears valid

The package @smithery/cli is verified to exist on npm (v1.1.4) and includes CLI functionality. While the exact command syntax can't be verified due to private documentation, the format follows standard CLI patterns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify Smithery CLI package and command syntax

# Check if the package exists on npm
curl -s https://registry.npmjs.org/@smithery/cli | jq '.["dist-tags"].latest'

# Check if the package is publicly accessible
npm view @smithery/cli

# Check for any usage examples or documentation of the install command
curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/smithery/cli/main/README.md 2>/dev/null || echo "Repository not found"

Length of output: 926

@Vasilije1990
Copy link
Contributor

@calclavia has this been tested?

@calclavia
Copy link
Contributor Author

calclavia commented Jan 31, 2025

@calclavia has this been tested?

Dockerfile is not tested but based on templates that worked for other MCPs. Would be good if you can try to build it locally first.

Also, I think I found an issue with this PR - it's in the wrong directory.
Just created a new one: #489

I'm also a bit confused because there's another repo that seems like a duplicate: (https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee-mcp-server)

Which one is the official repo?

Thanks!

@calclavia calclavia closed this Jan 31, 2025
@calclavia calclavia deleted the smithery/config-7y1g branch January 31, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants