Add manual execution for python-3.X tests #185
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies GitHub Actions workflow configurations for Python versions 3.9, 3.10, and 3.11. Each workflow is updated to include a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning Tool Failures:Tool Failure Count:Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the workflow configurations for testing Python versions 3.9, 3.10, and 3.11. Each configuration now includes a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Warning Tool Failures:Tool Failure Count:Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsGit: Failed to clone repository. Please run the Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
0xideas
force-pushed
the
COG-531-2-trigger-checks-manually-for-python-versions
branch
from
b7019ad to
dedd3a8
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_10.yml (1)
4-8: Consider adding more pull_request event types.While adding
workflow_dispatchfor manual triggering is good, limiting pull_request events to onlylabeledtype might be too restrictive. Consider including other relevant types likeopened,synchronize, andreopenedto ensure tests run on PR creation and updates.pull_request: branches: - main - types: [labeled] + types: [opened, synchronize, reopened, labeled]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_10.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test_python_3_11.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test_python_3_9.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_9.yml (2)
11-11:
Fix the concurrency group expression syntax.
The current concurrency group expression has syntax issues:
- Using
|for concatenation will treat the label condition as a string - This might not correctly group concurrent workflows based on the label
Apply this fix:
- group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }} | ${{ github.event.label.name == 'run-checks' }}
+ group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }}-${{ github.event.label.name == 'run-checks' }}Let's verify the concurrency settings across workflows:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other workflow files have the same concurrency issue
echo "Checking concurrency configuration in other workflows:"
rg "group:.+\|.+run-checks" .github/workflows/4-8: Verify the trigger configuration to prevent missed test runs.
The current configuration only triggers the workflow on label events, which might be too restrictive. Consider the following scenarios:
- New PRs won't automatically trigger tests until labeled
- Updates to existing PRs won't trigger new test runs
- No specific label is defined in the types section
Let's verify the label configuration across workflows:
✅ Verification successful
Workflow trigger configuration is correctly implemented
After reviewing the complete workflow files, I'm retracting my initial concerns. The current configuration is intentional and well-implemented:
- The
run-checkslabel is consistently used across all test workflows (Python 3.9, 3.10, 3.11) - The concurrency configuration properly references this label:
group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }} | ${{ github.event.label.name == 'run-checks' }} - The workflow can still be triggered manually via
workflow_dispatch - The label-based trigger is used across multiple test workflows (.github/workflows/test_*.yml) showing this is a deliberate pattern
This setup allows for controlled test execution through manual triggers and label-based automation, which is a valid approach for managing CI resources.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if other workflow files have consistent label triggers
# and if there's documentation about required labels
# Check other Python test workflows for consistency
echo "Checking other Python test workflows:"
rg -l "types: \[labeled\]" .github/workflows/test_python_*.yml
# Check if labels are documented
echo -e "\nChecking for label documentation:"
rg -i "run-checks" .github/CONTRIBUTING.md .github/pull_request_template.md README.md
Length of output: 1402
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the complete workflow files to understand the full context
# and see if there are any conditions or job-level filters
echo "Checking complete workflow files for Python tests:"
for file in .github/workflows/test_python_*.yml; do
echo -e "\n=== $file ===\n"
cat "$file"
done
# Also check if there are any other workflow files that might document the label usage
echo -e "\nChecking other workflow files for label documentation:"
fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows/ --exec grep -l "run-checks"
Length of output: 6383
.github/workflows/test_python_3_11.yml (1)
4-8: Verify the workflow trigger behavior.
The workflow will now only run in two scenarios:
- Manual trigger via workflow_dispatch
- When labels are added to pull requests
This means the workflow won't automatically run when:
- PRs are opened
- New commits are pushed to PRs
- PRs are synchronized with the base branch
Is this the intended behavior? If not, consider removing the types: [labeled] restriction to ensure the workflow runs on all PR events.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_9.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-67: Consider consolidating Python version workflows.Instead of maintaining separate workflow files for each Python version (3.9, 3.10, 3.11), consider consolidating them into a single workflow file using a matrix strategy. This would:
- Reduce code duplication
- Make it easier to maintain consistent trigger conditions
- Allow for centralized control of manual executions
Example structure:
name: Python Tests on: workflow_dispatch: pull_request: branches: [main] jobs: test: strategy: matrix: python-version: ['3.9', '3.10', '3.11'] runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }} # ... rest of the steps.github/workflows/test_python_3_10.yml (1)
4-8: Consider restricting workflow_dispatch triggerWhile adding manual trigger capability is good, the current configuration allows unrestricted manual runs. Consider adding conditions to
workflow_dispatchto ensure it only runs when appropriate, similar to the pull_request trigger.workflow_dispatch: + inputs: + run_tests: + description: 'Run Python 3.10 tests' + required: true + type: boolean.github/workflows/test_python_3_11.yml (1)
Line range hint
35-36: Use a specific version for actions/checkoutUsing
@masterfor actions/checkout is not recommended as it could lead to unexpected breaks. Instead, use a specific version:- uses: actions/checkout@master + uses: actions/checkout@v4This makes the workflow more stable and reproducible.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_10.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test_python_3_11.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test_python_3_9.yml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/test_python_3_10.yml (1)
4-11: Verify consistency across Python version workflows
Let's ensure these changes are consistently applied across all Python version workflows.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if similar changes are applied to Python 3.9 and 3.11 workflow files
# Test: Compare trigger and concurrency configurations across workflow files
echo "Checking workflow triggers and concurrency settings:"
for version in 9 10 11; do
echo -e "\nPython 3.${version} workflow:"
rg -A 10 "^on:|^concurrency:" .github/workflows/test_python_3_${version}.yml
done.github/workflows/test_python_3_11.yml (1)
4-8:
Review the pull request trigger configuration
While adding workflow_dispatch correctly enables manual execution, the types: [labeled] restriction means the workflow will only run when labels are added to PRs, not on PR updates. This might cause the workflow to miss testing important changes.
Consider one of these alternatives:
- Remove the
typesrestriction to run on all PR events - Add more event types like
synchronizeandopenedto catch PR updates:
types: [labeled, synchronize, opened]Let's check if other Python test workflows have similar restrictions:
#!/bin/bash
# Check trigger configurations in other Python test workflows
echo "Checking other Python test workflows:"
fd "test_python.*yml" .github/workflows/ --exec grep -A 5 "on:"
0xideas
deleted the
COG-531-2-trigger-checks-manually-for-python-versions
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes