-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 113
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Licensing #63
Comments
MIT |
Can I not vote
|
That's fine. Are you ok with whatever decision we make then? |
Happy with MIT. Worth noting for others, MIT is GPL2 compatible |
MIT is also fine with me. |
MIT |
How about Affero General Public License? I'm actually fine with whatever @tollmanz wants. He's the lead of the http://aaron.jorb.in On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Zack Tollman [email protected]
|
Never heard of it, but that is really interesting. I generally like the idea behind it, but have no interest in even trying to enforce that. I think you are voting for MIT 😄 |
OK, I'm with you fellas... MIT. |
Awesome! Thanks all. MIT it is! PR forthcoming. |
I failed to specify a license when this was initially released. Since then, I have accepted contributions from others. Following VVV's lead, I think it is important that current contributors have a say in the licensing.
I think we should settle on MIT or GPLv2 and I personally lean toward MIT, but am up for any thoughts folks have.
Can the following individuals please let me know your preference:
Thanks, everyone!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: