Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licensing #63

Closed
7 tasks done
tollmanz opened this issue May 25, 2015 · 10 comments
Closed
7 tasks done

Licensing #63

tollmanz opened this issue May 25, 2015 · 10 comments

Comments

@tollmanz
Copy link
Owner

I failed to specify a license when this was initially released. Since then, I have accepted contributions from others. Following VVV's lead, I think it is important that current contributors have a say in the licensing.

I think we should settle on MIT or GPLv2 and I personally lean toward MIT, but am up for any thoughts folks have.

Can the following individuals please let me know your preference:

Thanks, everyone!

@swalkinshaw
Copy link

MIT

@Ramoonus
Copy link
Contributor

Can I not vote
I have no in depth knowledge of both so I cannot decide

I failed to specify a license when this was initially released. Since then, I have accepted contributions from others. Following VVV's lead, I think it is important that current contributors have a say in the licensing.

I think we should settle on MIT or GPLv2 and I personally lean toward MIT, but am up for any thoughts folks have.

Can the following individuals please let me know your preference:

@Giuseppe-Mazzapica
@swalkinshaw
@aaronjorbin
@JustinSainton
@cmmarslender
@webaware
@Ramoonus
Thanks, everyone!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

@tollmanz
Copy link
Owner Author

Can I not vote
I have no in depth knowledge of both so I cannot decide

That's fine. Are you ok with whatever decision we make then?

@JustinSainton
Copy link
Contributor

Happy with MIT. Worth noting for others, MIT is GPL2 compatible

@cmmarslender
Copy link
Contributor

MIT is also fine with me.

@gmazzap
Copy link

gmazzap commented May 25, 2015

MIT

@aaronjorbin
Copy link

How about Affero General Public License?

I'm actually fine with whatever @tollmanz wants. He's the lead of the
project and I trust him. I'll vote for whatever he votes for.

http://aaron.jorb.in
twitter: twitter.com/aaronjorbin

On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Zack Tollman [email protected]
wrote:

Can I not vote
I have no in depth knowledge of both so I cannot decide

That's fine. Are you ok with whatever decision we make then?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#63 (comment)
.

@tollmanz
Copy link
Owner Author

Affero General Public License

Never heard of it, but that is really interesting. I generally like the idea behind it, but have no interest in even trying to enforce that.

I think you are voting for MIT 😄

@webaware
Copy link

OK, I'm with you fellas... MIT.

@tollmanz
Copy link
Owner Author

Awesome! Thanks all. MIT it is! PR forthcoming.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

8 participants