Skip to content

pat: correct numeric matching #439

pat: correct numeric matching

pat: correct numeric matching #439

Triggered via pull request July 3, 2024 15:55
@timbraytimbray
synchronize #329
numbers
Status Failure
Total duration 41s
Artifacts

benchmarks.yml

on: pull_request
Matrix: Benchmarks
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

1 error and 8 warnings
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
# :warning: **Performance Alert** :warning: Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark **'Go Benchmark'**. Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold `1.20`. | Benchmark suite | Current: 49e80c7cf7bd3a03aa77a2509d28147e88412c12 | Previous: 78e2ec899492594c162ff63e5fe34f6ffae21c97 | Ratio | |-|-|-|-| | `BenchmarkCityLots` | `10188` ns/op 2191 B/op 79 allocs/op | `5592` ns/op 773 B/op 31 allocs/op | `1.82` | | `BenchmarkCityLots - ns/op` | `10188` ns/op | `5592` ns/op | `1.82` | | `BenchmarkCityLots - B/op` | `2191` B/op | `773` B/op | `2.83` | | `BenchmarkCityLots - allocs/op` | `79` allocs/op | `31` allocs/op | `2.55` | | `Benchmark_JsonFlattner_Evaluate_ContextFields` | `1144` ns/op 136 B/op 8 allocs/op | `726.2` ns/op 56 B/op 4 allocs/op | `1.58` | | `Benchmark_JsonFlattner_Evaluate_ContextFields - ns/op` | `1144` ns/op | `726.2` ns/op | `1.58` | | `Benchmark_JsonFlattner_Evaluate_ContextFields - B/op` | `136` B/op | `56` B/op | `2.43` | | `Benchmark_JsonFlattner_Evaluate_ContextFields - allocs/op` | `8` allocs/op | `4` allocs/op | `2` | This comment was automatically generated by [workflow](https://github.com/timbray/quamina/actions?query=workflow%3ABenchmarks) using [github-action-benchmark](https://github.com/marketplace/actions/continuous-benchmark).
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 5592 and current value is 10188. It is 1.8218884120171674x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 5592 and current value is 10188. It is 1.8218884120171674x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 773 and current value is 2191. It is 2.834411384217335x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 31 and current value is 79. It is 2.5483870967741935x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 726.2 and current value is 1144. It is 1.5753236023134123x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 726.2 and current value is 1144. It is 1.5753236023134123x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 56 and current value is 136. It is 2.4285714285714284x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2
Benchmarks (1.19, ubuntu-latest)
Performance alert! Previous value was 4 and current value is 8. It is 2x worse than previous exceeding a ratio threshold 1.2