Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

drop stagingyum from rsync config #2059

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024
Merged

drop stagingyum from rsync config #2059

merged 1 commit into from
May 8, 2024

Conversation

evgeni
Copy link
Member

@evgeni evgeni commented May 6, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link
Member

@ekohl ekohl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This keeps the existing server running. Is that intentional and will you drop it when it's migrated to a new server?

@evgeni
Copy link
Member Author

evgeni commented May 6, 2024

This keeps the existing server running. Is that intentional and will you drop it when it's migrated to a new server?

Yes, because the "server" also serves other paths.

But I read https://github.com/puppetlabs/puppetlabs-rsync/blob/main/manifests/server/module.pp in a way that the concat fragment is now gone and thus it gets removed from rsyncd.conf

@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the drop-stagingyum-rsync branch from b0382bf to 66150d0 Compare May 7, 2024 13:03
@@ -62,7 +62,6 @@
contain web::vhost::yum

class { 'web::vhost::stagingyum':
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you don't set parameters, the contain below is sufficient because it implies including the class. Note we do the same with web::vhost::stagingdeb.

@evgeni evgeni force-pushed the drop-stagingyum-rsync branch from 66150d0 to 68d996d Compare May 8, 2024 07:49
@evgeni evgeni merged commit 89df62f into master May 8, 2024
2 checks passed
@evgeni evgeni deleted the drop-stagingyum-rsync branch May 8, 2024 07:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants