Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Katello 4.14.3 #3638

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 3.12
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

chris1984
Copy link
Member

What changes are you introducing?

Adding Katello 4.14.3 release notes

Why are you introducing these changes? (Explanation, links to references, issues, etc.)

Katello/katello#11299

Anything else to add? (Considerations, potential downsides, alternative solutions you have explored, etc.)

Checklists

  • I am okay with my commits getting squashed when you merge this PR.
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines.

Please cherry-pick my commits into:

  • Foreman 3.13/Katello 4.15 (EL9 only)
  • Foreman 3.12/Katello 4.14 (Satellite 6.16)
  • Foreman 3.11/Katello 4.13 (orcharhino 6.11 on EL8 only; orcharhino 7.0 on EL8+EL9)
  • Foreman 3.10/Katello 4.12
  • Foreman 3.9/Katello 4.11 (Satellite 6.15; orcharhino 6.8/6.9/6.10)
  • Foreman 3.8/Katello 4.10
  • Foreman 3.7/Katello 4.9 (Satellite 6.14)
  • We do not accept PRs for Foreman older than 3.7.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 3, 2025

The PR preview for 8970c30 is available at theforeman-foreman-documentation-preview-pr-3638.surge.sh

The following output files are affected by this PR:

show diff

show diff as HTML

Copy link
Contributor

@Lennonka Lennonka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Is that all? 😄

@Lennonka Lennonka added the style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective label Feb 4, 2025
@chris1984
Copy link
Member Author

LGTM

Is that all? 😄

Yeah lol

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
style review done No issues from docs style/grammar perspective
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants