-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
querier: Allow passing allow-list of store (IPs?) that should be used for query for debug purposes; Add multiselect on UI #2919
Comments
I am interested in doing it. After looking at how to implement it, I have a design question: the query api uses the proxy as a |
Awesome. I think it would be nice to avoid passing this in protobuf, but we could technically create some hints. I would also avoid running just ProxyStore and changing methods. We have two options:
I would start for now with 1 and then 2 long term. WDYT? (: |
Pass through context seems good for me. 👍 |
Hello, can you take a look at #2931 ? It's still in WIP as I need to finish the testing but I would like your input first. |
I did, and left some comments. Good approach overall!
…On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 20:28, Geoffrey Beausire ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello, can you take a look at #2931
<#2931> ? It's still in WIP as I
need to finish the testing but I would like your input first.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2919 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABVA3OYFGYSDIIH7Z5Z4Y4TR5CFMRANCNFSM4PEPKKAA>
.
|
Hello 👋 Looks like there was no activity on this issue for last 30 days. |
It's now done in #2931 and documented. |
It would be awesome to add the ability to query only a subset of stores to detect which one is slow/ problematic etc (: It should be hidden option only for ad-hoc query.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: