-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JOSS review: Contribution and authorship #2
Comments
Brice Lebrun is credited as a contributor, as he designed the package logo (I updated the DESCRIPTION file). Joe Roe is credited as author, as his 'era' package gave me the inspiration for 'aion' (as stated in the paper's acknowledgements). It seems fair to me to credit him in this way. I suggested to Joe Roe that he co-sign the paper, but he declined, considering it not justified (maybe @joeroe can confirm?). |
Can confirm, I'm very grateful for the acknowledgement but I think all credit for the work on this package goes to Nicolas :) |
Ok, I don't think it makes sense to split hairs on this. Maybe the short paragraph in the Acknowlegements section of the paper could be made more explicit? |
Hello, I am one of the reviewers for the JOSS submission described at openjournals/joss-reviews#6210 👋
As I go through the checklist, I find this discrepancy:
Could you please clarify the authorship, either in the paper or in the documentation? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: