ip/route: dst_address should not be mandatory

[n0rad]

Currently routeros_ip_route requires dst_address to be set, but in some cases, routes must be set without it like for example in multi ISP failover scenario.

It should not be a mandatory field.

╷
│ Error: Missing required argument
│
│   on ip_route.tf line 135, in resource "routeros_ip_route" "d2_rmark_isp22":
│  135: resource "routeros_ip_route" "d2_rmark_isp22" {
│
│ The argument "dst_address" is required, but no definition was found.
╵

[vaerh]

Please publish the configuration of your resource.

[n0rad]

resource "routeros_ip_route" "d2_rmark_isp22" {
  distance    = 2
  gateway     = "10.10.10.1"
  routing_table = "to_isp22"
  target_scope = 12
}

following mikrotik documentation at: https://help.mikrotik.com/docs/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=26476608

[vaerh]

The problem is fixed, but I want to warn you: the "dst_address" field will still be set to "0.0.0.0/0".

[gfenn-newbury]

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.3.6 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

[n0rad]

Thx, you are awesome, I see that mikrotik keep it blank when not set through UI, but I suppose it's equal to 0.0.0.0/0