Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added the skip_destroy argument for functions #600

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

catrielg
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Added the "skip_destroy" argument for the "function" resource.
More info from the AWS Provider Doc:
(Optional) Set to true if you do not wish the function to be deleted at destroy time, and instead just remove the function from the Terraform state.

Motivation and Context

Particularly useful for Lambda@Edge that cannot be destroyed if they are still associated with a CloudFront Distribution.

@catrielg catrielg changed the title Added the "skip_destroy" argument for the "function" resource feat: Added the "skip_destroy" argument for the "function" resource Jul 28, 2024
@antonbabenko antonbabenko changed the title feat: Added the "skip_destroy" argument for the "function" resource feat: Added the skip_destroy argument for functions Aug 23, 2024
@antonbabenko antonbabenko merged commit 36c6109 into terraform-aws-modules:master Aug 23, 2024
29 checks passed
antonbabenko pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2024
## [7.8.0](v7.7.1...v7.8.0) (2024-08-23)

### Features

* Added the skip_destroy argument for functions ([#600](#600)) ([36c6109](36c6109))
@antonbabenko
Copy link
Member

This PR is included in version 7.8.0 🎉

Copy link

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues. If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 24, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants