We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug
Using too precise timestamps for event makes it malformed as spec only allows up to 6 digits
Expected behavior
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5424.html#section-6 RFC5424 says TIME-SECFRAC = "." 1*6DIGIT
TIME-SECFRAC = "." 1*6DIGIT
How to reproduce
Use too precise timestamps with more than 6 digits of fractions, for example using Instant.now()
Instant.now()
Screenshots
Software version
1.0.1
Desktop (please complete the following information if relevant):
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
use timestamp.toEpochMilli() instead of Instant to avoid teragrep/rlo…
6d4e259
…_14#10
use timestamp.toEpochMilli() instead of Instant (#49)
763769a
* use timestamp.toEpochMilli() instead of Instant to avoid teragrep/rlo_14#10 * test that timestamp matches to an expected pattern
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
Using too precise timestamps for event makes it malformed as spec only allows up to 6 digits
Expected behavior
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5424.html#section-6 RFC5424 says
TIME-SECFRAC = "." 1*6DIGIT
How to reproduce
Use too precise timestamps with more than 6 digits of fractions, for example using
Instant.now()
Screenshots
Software version
1.0.1
Desktop (please complete the following information if relevant):
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: