This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 23, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RFC: adopt zip 215 #144
RFC: adopt zip 215 #144
Changes from 8 commits
d7f4c17
282e232
12bf112
8dedd05
8170d35
b0f659f
7d96f21
3c183b2
df4076d
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In re: this line and the comment made by @tessr here: #144 (comment) ,
as far as I know there are no current plans to upstream the library to Filippo or Google, so definitely don't count on that.
The maintenance aspect of that library is definitely a weak point. I'm not a Go expert and I'm only casually familiar with its ecosystem (e.g., I had no idea how to publish a package and I'm still not sure I did it right), so ideally someone who has those skills could help with that (or take it over).
That said, once the library is complete I think that it should require very little maintenance, because it has a tiny API surface, and it solves a problem with a fixed specification (ZIP215).
What has to happen for it to be complete? Basically there are two changes. First, it should be changed to use https://pkg.go.dev/filippo.io/edwards25519 internally, now that that library exists. Second, I'd like it to support batch verification with an init-update-finalize style API like
ed25519-zebra
. Currently this isn't scoped out on the repo's roadmap because I've been pretty busy, and I'm not sure when I would have time to make those changes, but I'd be happy to mentor someone else who'd like to have a go at making them.