Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DT-156] Fix broken breakpoint UI on workflow detail page header #960

Merged

Conversation

laurakwhit
Copy link
Contributor

What was changed

Fixed flow of text and actions at different breakpoints on the workflow detail page header.

1 2 3
large md Screen Shot 2022-11-22 at 11 23 09 AM

Centered check icon in toggle switch.

Before After
Screen Shot 2022-11-22 at 11 24 23 AM Screen Shot 2022-11-22 at 11 26 33 AM

Checklist

  1. Closes: DT-145

  2. How was this tested: n/a

  1. Any docs updates needed? n/a

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 22, 2022

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated
holocene ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 22, 2022 at 6:43PM (UTC)
ui ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Nov 22, 2022 at 6:43PM (UTC)

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Nov 22, 2022



Test summary

76 0 12 0


Run details

Project Temporal UI
Status Passed
Commit 2223f5e72b ℹ️
Started Nov 22, 2022 6:44 PM
Ended Nov 22, 2022 6:49 PM
Duration 04:47 💡
OS Linux Ubuntu - 20.04
Browser Chrome 107

View run in Cypress Dashboard ➡️


This comment has been generated by cypress-bot as a result of this project's GitHub integration settings. You can manage this integration in this project's settings in the Cypress Dashboard

@Alex-Tideman Alex-Tideman self-requested a review November 28, 2022 21:24
@laurakwhit laurakwhit merged commit 6db4be9 into main Nov 28, 2022
@laurakwhit laurakwhit deleted the DT-156-fix-broken-breakpoint-ui-on-workflow-detail-page-header branch November 28, 2022 21:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants