Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

geo:point attribute type support [+ geo:line, geo:box and geo:polygon] #1038

Closed
fgalan opened this issue Jun 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

geo:point attribute type support [+ geo:line, geo:box and geo:polygon] #1038

fgalan opened this issue Jun 26, 2015 · 4 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@fgalan
Copy link
Member

fgalan commented Jun 26, 2015

(Originally included as comment on #947)

Support the special processing of geo:point, i.e. string format checking and using it to match geo-queries.

@fgalan fgalan changed the title geo:point support geo:point attribute type support Jun 26, 2015
@fgalan fgalan added this to the 0.28.0 milestone Feb 4, 2016
@fgalan fgalan self-assigned this Feb 4, 2016
@fgalan
Copy link
Member Author

fgalan commented Feb 5, 2016

Partially implemented for geo:point in PR #1771. The other "geo:things" are pending.

@fgalan fgalan changed the title geo:point attribute type support geo:point attribute type support [+ geo:line, geo:box and geo:polygon] Feb 5, 2016
@fgalan fgalan modified the milestones: 0.28.0, 1.0.0 Feb 24, 2016
@fgalan fgalan modified the milestones: 1.0.0, 1.1.0 Mar 17, 2016
fgalan added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 1, 2016
@fgalan
Copy link
Member Author

fgalan commented Apr 1, 2016

Completed in PR #1982

@fgalan fgalan modified the milestones: QATestPending, 1.1.0 Apr 6, 2016
@fgalan fgalan assigned iariasleon and unassigned fgalan Apr 6, 2016
@fgalan
Copy link
Member Author

fgalan commented Apr 6, 2016

Implemented in PR #1982. Moved to QATestPending while the acceptance test to cover this functionality gets implemented.

@iariasleon iariasleon modified the milestones: 1.1.0, QATestPending Aug 4, 2016
@iariasleon
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM
issue associated: #2426

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants