-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Cleanup resources of ClusterTask #5977
Conversation
This commit cleans up the unused functions for ClusterTask. It aims to keep the hygiene of the codebase and gets the repo ready for swapping the storage version to v1.
This is an unreferenced type so it has not been regarded as dead code even though it was not used anywhere. |
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the change @JeromeJu!
👍 I think release note is needed? |
I think we might not as this is not part of the API but the reconciler? |
It could be a using facing change, since it is public type? |
Makes sense! Updated, thanks for pointing this out. |
/approve nit on the release note: the function is being removed, not deprecated ("deprecated" would make me think it's still usable) |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lbernick, XinruZhang The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Changes
This commit cleans up the unused functions for ClusterTask. It aims to keep the hygiene of the codebase and gets the repo ready for swapping the storage version to v1.
./pkg/reconciler/v1alpha1
/kind cleanup
part of #5979
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
functionality, content, code)
/kind <type>
. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tepRelease Notes