Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix TestTaskRunRetry for k8s 1.22.9 and later #4944

Conversation

abayer
Copy link
Contributor

@abayer abayer commented Jun 7, 2022

Changes

We just switched to k8s 1.22.9 on CI last night, and TestTaskRunRetry started failing. After a bunch of investigation, I determined this was due to kubernetes/kubernetes#108366, which went into k8s 1.22.9. This resulted in the pod.Status.Phase that TestTaskRunRetry expected to be updated instantly having a delay. I could have fixed this with a sleep, but decided verifying that each container in the pod had terminated with the expected exit code was cleaner.

/kind misc

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Release notes block below has been filled in
    (if there are no user facing changes, use release note "NONE")

Release Notes

NONE

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. labels Jun 7, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from afrittoli and dibyom June 7, 2022 16:55
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 7, 2022
@abayer abayer marked this pull request as ready for review June 7, 2022 16:55
@tekton-robot tekton-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 7, 2022
@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Jun 7, 2022

/assign @vdemeester @lbernick @afrittoli @jerop

@abayer
Copy link
Contributor Author

abayer commented Jun 7, 2022

/assign @pritidesai

Copy link
Member

@jerop jerop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @abayer for digging into this issue, and the quick fix!

TestPipelineTaskTimeout is failing this time and it's a known flake - #4427

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jerop

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 7, 2022
@jerop
Copy link
Member

jerop commented Jun 7, 2022

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests

@jerop
Copy link
Member

jerop commented Jun 7, 2022

/test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests

We just switched to k8s 1.22.9 on CI last night, and `TestTaskRunRetry` started failing. After a bunch of investigation, I determined this was due to kubernetes/kubernetes#108366, which went into k8s 1.22.9. This resulted in the `pod.Status.Phase` that `TestTaskRunRetry` expected to be updated instantly having a delay. I could have fixed this with a sleep, but decided verifying that each container in the pod had terminated with the expected exit code was cleaner.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>
@abayer abayer force-pushed the fix-e2e-retry-test-for-k8s-1.22.8-and-later branch from 3b6e994 to dcfd1da Compare June 7, 2022 17:32
@@ -146,8 +146,14 @@ spec:
if _, found := podNames[p.Name]; !found {
t.Errorf("BUG: TaskRunStatus.RetriesStatus did not report pod name %q", p.Name)
}
if p.Status.Phase != corev1.PodFailed {
t.Errorf("BUG: Pod %q is not failed: %v", p.Name, p.Status.Phase)
// Check each container in the pod, rather than the phase, since the phase doesn't update to a terminal state instantly.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉 thank you for adding the explicit check!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If the check against p.Status.Phase still worked (without a sleep - in my local testing, it did work fine with a 2s delay before the Pods(namespace).List(...) call), I would find the each-container check to be overkill, but hey. =)

@pritidesai
Copy link
Member

Thanks @abayer 🎉
/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 7, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit b5ea3e9 into tektoncd:main Jun 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/misc Categorizes issue or PR as a miscellaneuous one. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesnt merit a release note. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants