-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add -o name to pipeline start #1540
Conversation
Add -o name to start to simply output the pipelinerun that has been started. Tests are a bit of pain, it's nearly impossible (or i don't know how) to fakeout, since I can't get a generate pipelinerunt to come out we just test emptyness, it's okay tho because it tests the flags i guess 🙃. This has been reformated with latest gofumpt https://github.com/mvdan/gofumpt let me know if that confuses anyone and would like me to break that change. Co-authored-by: Lan Liang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chmouel Boudjnah <[email protected]>
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
@liangyuanpeng I have added you as co-author since you were on the original param in #1433 let me know if it's ok for you. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: vdemeester The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Add -o name to start to simply output the pipelinerun that has been
started.
Tests are a bit of pain, it's nearly impossible (or i don't know how) to
fakeout, since I can't get a generate pipelinerunt to come out we just
test emptyness, it's okay tho because it tests the flags i guess 🙃.
This has been reformated with latest gofumpt
https://github.com/mvdan/gofumpt let me know if that confuses anyone and
would like me to break that change.
Co-authored-by: @liangyuanpeng
Release Notes