Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

90%: working multiple queues #1

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jan 28, 2016
Merged

Conversation

omarqureshi
Copy link

Gets resque-web to work with multiple failure queues when using the 1.25.2 API with a fix around multiple failure queue backends (resque/resque#1234)

This isn't tested with the resque 2.0 API, especially around the retrying of all jobs due to requeue_and_remove not accepting a queue name parameter.

Currently the Gemfile specifies the talis fork of resque, however, once the multiple failure queue backend fix has been merged in, this should be good to use with mainline resque.

@omarqureshi omarqureshi changed the title Working multiple queues 90%: working multiple queues Dec 10, 2015
#API agnostic for Resque 2 with duck typing on requeue_and_remove
def reque_single_job(id)
def requeue_single_job(id, queue)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 for correcting spelling

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

DEATH TO AMERICAN SPELLING!

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you think que is American?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I stand corrected - Spanish then!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants