Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add useDynamicMutation hook #130
Add useDynamicMutation hook #130
Changes from 1 commit
1b212dd
324cc0b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
A nit on naming here. This is the
Js.t
created by calling.make()
on thegraphql_ppx_re
module, yeah? Could we use the same nomenclature we do inuseMutation
and name thisrequest
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The type is slightly different (explained below), which is why I went with a different name. Doesn't bother me to change it though, if you think it's clearer.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah that makes sense. I really wish we could destructure "open" objects like this so it'd be more like:
Still I do find
request
a little easier to understand. This object passed to this callback is the result of calling.make()
on thatgraphql_ppx_re
module, and we have been calling thatrequest
throughout the codebase. Even tho we're restricting its type a bit more, it's more or less the same thing.