Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix NaN parsing #69

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024
Merged

Fix NaN parsing #69

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

jojoelfe
Copy link
Collaborator

Initial draft for fix of #68, I think the solution is valid, but the test could be more comprehensive.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.73%. Comparing base (5b19406) to head (7aeb97e).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #69      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.93%   82.73%   +1.80%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         278      307      +29     
==========================================
+ Hits          225      254      +29     
  Misses         53       53              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@alisterburt alisterburt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks good to me, merge when you're happy with it! 🙂

@alisterburt
Copy link
Member

Test fail is a writing speed test, I'm unsure how this would be affected by this PR so still ok

@alisterburt alisterburt merged commit da129b2 into teamtomo:main Oct 23, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants