Skip to content

Issues: tc39/proposal-explicit-resource-management

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

27 Open 125 Closed
27 Open 125 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Suggestion: add using fields to classes that are auto-disposed on @@dispose
#250 opened Dec 23, 2024 by dead-claudia
In the spec draft missed (Async)DisposableStack.prototype.constructor
#249 opened Dec 22, 2024 by zloirock
1
Is for (using of = obj;;); valid syntax?
#248 opened Dec 20, 2024 by arai-a
7
Disposal should be based on a DAG, not a stack (e.g. AsyncDisposableDag)
#246 opened Nov 7, 2024 by alexweej
1
implement features required for structured concurrency
#245 opened Oct 11, 2024 by graingert
using introduces unnecessary complexity
#244 opened Oct 4, 2024 by JadenSimon
11
Implementation Status
#242 opened Oct 2, 2024 by dreamorosi
6
Any callback passed to defer should be removable
#238 opened Jul 20, 2024 by matthieusieben
How should stack traces of SuppressedError look like?
#235 opened Jul 7, 2024 by debadree25
11
Write test262 tests for deterministic collapse of Await for nullish values
#233 opened Jun 15, 2024 by rbuckton
@rbuckton
A subclass that overrides DisposableStack#dispose must also override DisposableStack#[Symbol.dispose]
#231 opened Jun 14, 2024 by rictic
1
5
Identity cover grammar
#224 opened Apr 9, 2024 by waldemarhorwat
4
Stage 3 feedback: can we make the number of using decls that need disposal statically knowable?
#215 opened Mar 14, 2024 by syg
11
Masking disposable
#204 opened Sep 27, 2023 by jasnell
16
Add description of differences between a single declaration with multiple bindings and multiple declarations with single bindings
#202 opened Sep 9, 2023 by benblank
1
Where would be an appropriate place to propose a related type?
#198 opened Aug 2, 2023 by benlesh
5
[Symbol.enter]() Follow-on proposal
#195 opened Jul 19, 2023 by rbuckton
19
Should await using Await for forward compatibility? discussion Discussion topic, no immediate action required. normative Indicates a normative change to the specification
#189 opened Jul 11, 2023 by mhofman
8
How to lint legacy usage of new Disposable type? discussion Discussion topic, no immediate action required. external Indicates a dependency on an external task, process, or group question Further information is requested
#187 opened Jul 10, 2023 by rixtox
7
In the spec draft, missing exposing of Symbol.{ dispose, asyncDispose } bug Something isn't working normative Indicates a normative change to the specification
#185 opened Jul 7, 2023 by zloirock
6
What happens if the object escapes? documentation Indicates a change to the documentation/explainer for the propsal.
#161 opened Jun 19, 2023 by Lexicality
3
dispose should not be a property on the object
#160 opened Jun 16, 2023 by rbalicki2
8
Disposable is leaky by default
#159 opened Jun 4, 2023 by rixtox
84
What's the code pattern for passing through non-cleanup-related thrown errors?
#137 opened Jan 12, 2023 by brad4d
5
Web API integration discussion Discussion topic, no immediate action required.
#95 opened Sep 7, 2022 by littledan Stage 4
4
ProTip! Type g p on any issue or pull request to go back to the pull request listing page.