-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
editorial: tweak recent commit #376
Conversation
(16 occurrences, all in "Applying the `**` operator") ... for consistency with the rest of the spec.
(20 occurrences, all in "Applying the `**` operator")
... "Applying the `**` operator"
@@ -12770,33 +12770,33 @@ | |||
</ul> | |||
</emu-clause> | |||
<emu-clause id="sec-applying-the-exp-operator"> | |||
<h1>Applying the `**` operator</h1> | |||
<h1>Applying the `**` Operator</h1> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The spec isn’t consistent as to whether title case or sentence case should be used for headings. E.g. https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-normative-references uses sentence case, but https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-overview uses title case. (I’d personally prefer sentence case everywhere.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually, it's pretty consistent on using title-case. Your example of sentence-case was changed to title-case 4 days ago in 5ee6f14. (I guess the rendered version hasn't caught up yet.)
(Looking at some example specs, it seems like ECMA prefers title-case and ISO prefers sentence-case.)
No description provided.