Editorial: Eliminate 'bare' uses of "completion" #2682
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... i.e., uses of "completion" that aren't preceded by "normal", "abrupt", "throw", etc., and aren't just using it in its usual English sense. This includes 8 occurrences of "completion value".
I left the 'Meaning' for
[[Type]]
("The type of completion that occurred") as it's maybe the usual English sense. (A Completion Record doesn't "occur".) It's debatable though.I handled the occurrences of "completion value" in various ways, depending on the context.
In cleaning up "completion value" in the description of HostImportModuleDynamically, I merged 2 list items, which is a bit surprising, so look at that one carefully.
In the Annex F cases of "completion value", I also changed 3 occurrences of
a normal completion whose value is ~empty~
toa normal completion containing ~empty~
.This is a follow-up to #2547, prompted by this discussion.