Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test of model_reader.py #299

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 5, 2015

Conversation

aoifeboyle
Copy link
Contributor

@wkerzendorf Continuing on from PRs #292 and #297. Just added another few lines to the test to check that the zone parameters were being matched correctly between the model and abundance files. This was an issue with a previous version so it's a good thing to check.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.23%) to 55.27% when pulling 3c4ae8e on aoifeboyle:io/test_model_reader into e444ffe on tardis-sn:master.

@wkerzendorf
Copy link
Member

@aoifeboyle well done! I'm merging this now!

wkerzendorf added a commit that referenced this pull request May 5, 2015
@wkerzendorf wkerzendorf merged commit a31f5bb into tardis-sn:master May 5, 2015
@landscape-bot
Copy link

Code Health
Code quality remained the same when pulling 3c4ae8e on aoifeboyle:io/test_model_reader into e444ffe on tardis-sn:master.

@aoifeboyle aoifeboyle deleted the io/test_model_reader branch May 5, 2015 18:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants