Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Part 1: Build M/M/1 model #170

Closed
2 tasks done
taivop opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 0 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Part 1: Build M/M/1 model #170

taivop opened this issue Dec 1, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@taivop
Copy link
Owner

taivop commented Dec 1, 2016

Complete by Thu 08 Dec 2016!

TODO:

  • think which timestamps to use -- this affects result!
  • add more statistics?

  • entire system: from client point of view as one system
  • if model’s predicted response times are completely wrong, then it is OK? because model is not appropriate for our case?
    • is it OK to say model is simply not appropriate?
      • A: possibly. but maybe another problem
  • say where the data came from (new trace from MS2)
  • [slack] take peak throughput of the trace for service rate and mean for arrival rate. That's the approach Alonso mentioned in the lecture.
@taivop taivop added this to the Milestone 3 milestone Dec 1, 2016
@taivop taivop added the priority label Dec 1, 2016
@taivop taivop mentioned this issue Dec 1, 2016
4 tasks
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2016
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 5, 2016
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2016
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2016
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2016
taivop added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2016
@taivop taivop closed this as completed Dec 6, 2016
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant