Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Fix num_splits in parallel_struct_for #7121

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2023

Conversation

strongoier
Copy link
Contributor

Issue: fix #7112

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 11, 2023

Deploy Preview for docsite-preview ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit b19f358
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docsite-preview/deploys/63be3929400033000947e0a6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-7121--docsite-preview.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site settings.

Copy link
Contributor

@g1n0st g1n0st left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! Thanks for the fixing!

@strongoier strongoier merged commit 745ddc8 into taichi-dev:master Jan 11, 2023
@strongoier strongoier deleted the fix-7112 branch January 11, 2023 07:01
@strongoier strongoier added this to the v1.4.0 milestone Jan 11, 2023
lin-hitonami pushed a commit to lin-hitonami/taichi that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2023
Issue: fix taichi-dev#7112

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
lin-hitonami pushed a commit to lin-hitonami/taichi that referenced this pull request Jan 12, 2023
Issue: fix taichi-dev#7112

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
quadpixels pushed a commit to quadpixels/taichi that referenced this pull request May 13, 2023
Issue: fix taichi-dev#7112

Co-authored-by: pre-commit-ci[bot] <66853113+pre-commit-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Certain pointer-based SNode tree behaves incorrect in packed mode
2 participants