-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[bug] [refactor] Fix error when ti.init() not called by deprecating Expr.layout_materialized #1347
Merged
archibate
merged 11 commits into
taichi-dev:master
from
archibate:fix-expr-layout-materialized-not-found
Jul 4, 2020
Merged
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2652c70
[bug] [refactor] Fix AttributeError when ti.init() not called by depr…
archibate 6af59fc
remove accident
archibate b8134a0
add test
archibate f9d9deb
[skip ci] enforce code format
taichi-gardener 244b591
[skip ci] Update python/taichi/lang/impl.py
archibate 766c6c8
[skip ci] Merge branch 'master' into fix-expr-layout-materialized-not…
archibate c52bb1a
Merge branch 'fix-expr-layout-materialized-not-found' of https://gith…
archibate db5db90
try fix test
archibate 32be4e5
[skip ci] Merge branch 'master' into fix-expr-layout-materialized-not…
archibate 6681a4a
did fix
archibate 01b0fa2
[skip ci] Update tests/python/test_runtime.py
archibate File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ | ||
*.swp | ||
*.swo | ||
/.vs | ||
/tags | ||
/.*_localrc | ||
/tags | ||
/Debug | ||
*.sdf | ||
/x64 | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ | ||
import taichi as ti | ||
from taichi import make_temp_file | ||
import sys, os | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_without_init(): | ||
# We want to check if Taichi works well without ``ti.init()``. | ||
# But in test ``ti.init()`` will always be called in last ``@ti.all_archs``. | ||
# So we have to create a new Taichi instance, i.e. test in a sandbox. | ||
content = ''' | ||
import taichi as ti | ||
assert ti.cfg.arch == ti.cpu | ||
|
||
x = ti.var(ti.i32, (2, 3)) | ||
assert x.shape == (2, 3) | ||
|
||
x[1, 2] = 4 | ||
assert x[1, 2] == 4 | ||
''' | ||
filename = make_temp_file() | ||
with open(filename, 'w') as f: | ||
f.write(content) | ||
assert os.system(f'{sys.executable} {filename}') == 0 | ||
|
||
|
||
@ti.all_archs | ||
@ti.all_archs | ||
archibate marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
@ti.must_throw(RuntimeError) | ||
def test_materialization_after_kernel(): | ||
x = ti.var(ti.f32, (3, 4)) | ||
|
||
@ti.kernel | ||
def func(): | ||
print(x[2, 3]) | ||
|
||
func() | ||
|
||
y = ti.var(ti.f32, (2, 3)) | ||
# ERROR: No new variable should be declared after kernel invocation! | ||
|
||
|
||
@ti.all_archs | ||
@ti.must_throw(RuntimeError) | ||
def test_materialization_after_access(): | ||
x = ti.var(ti.f32, (3, 4)) | ||
|
||
print(x[2, 3]) | ||
|
||
y = ti.var(ti.f32, (2, 3)) | ||
# ERROR: No new variable should be declared after Python-scope tensor access! | ||
|
||
|
||
@ti.all_archs | ||
@ti.must_throw(RuntimeError) | ||
def test_materialization_after_get_shape(): | ||
x = ti.var(ti.f32, (3, 4)) | ||
|
||
print(x.shape) | ||
|
||
y = ti.var(ti.f32, (2, 3)) | ||
# ERROR: No new variable should be declared after Python-scope tensor access! |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So we no longer deprecate this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, since
tensor.parent()
returns atensor
whiletensor.snode().parent()
return a snode, it seems this is irreplaceable and many test is using this..