SIN relabels + typos #3429
SIN relabels + typos #3429
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve the rebranding of the documentation from "Synapse RFQ system" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN) system." This update is consistently applied across various documents, ensuring that terminology aligns with the new branding. The structure and content of the API documentation, including endpoint descriptions and operational details, remain largely unchanged, with a focus on clarity and consistency. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md (1)
209-209: Fix the spacing in "willrelease".There should be a space between "will" and "release".
-This willrelease the deposit funds from escrow +This will release the deposit funds from escrowdocs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/70-CanonicalRelayer/index.md (1)
47-47: Remove redundant "network" in "SIN network".Since "N" in "SIN" already stands for "Network", the phrase "SIN network" is redundant.
-participating in the Synapse Intent Network (SIN) network +participating in the Synapse Intent Network (SIN)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/60-Security/index.md (1)
52-52: Fix grammar: Use "proof" instead of "prove/proof".The word "prove" is a verb, while "proof" is the correct noun form to use in this context.
-During this time, the prove/proof is eligible to be disputed by [Guard] entities. +During this time, the proof is eligible to be disputed by [Guard] entities.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~52-~52: The word ‘prove’ is a verb. Did you mean the noun “proof”?
Context: ..._period) begins. During this time, the prove/proof is eligible to be disputed by [Gu...(PREPOSITION_VERB)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/10-Quoting/Quoter API/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/10-Quoting/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/15-Bridging/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/20-Relaying/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/20-Relaying/riskFactors.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/30-Proving/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/40-Claiming/index.md(1 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/60-Security/index.md(2 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/70-CanonicalRelayer/index.md(2 hunks)docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/40-Claiming/index.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md
[style] ~41-~41: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...IN) is an RFQ (Request-For-Quote) based <abbr title="'Intent' refers to a user authorizing specific actions that they want to achieve, typically in very simple terms, such as a bridge or swap. Actual...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/60-Security/index.md
[grammar] ~52-~52: The word ‘prove’ is a verb. Did you mean the noun “proof”?
Context: ..._period) begins. During this time, the prove/proof is eligible to be disputed by [Gu...
(PREPOSITION_VERB)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/15-Bridging/index.md (1)
40-40: LGTM! Terminology updates are consistent
The rebranding from "Synapse RFQ" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN)" has been applied consistently in these sections while maintaining the technical accuracy of the documentation.
Also applies to: 44-44
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/30-Proving/index.md (1)
81-81: LGTM! Improved clarity in the next steps section
The text flow has been improved while maintaining technical accuracy.
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/10-Quoting/index.md (1)
38-38: LGTM! Consistent terminology update
The rebranding from "Synapse RFQ" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN)" has been applied consistently while preserving the technical accuracy of the quoting system description.
Also applies to: 40-40
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/20-Relaying/riskFactors.md (1)
42-42: LGTM! Consistent rebranding to SIN
The rebranding from "Synapse RFQ system" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN) system" is consistent with the PR objectives and maintains the clarity of the warning message.
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/20-Relaying/index.md (1)
40-40: LGTM! Consistent rebranding to SIN
The rebranding from "Synapse RFQ System" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN) System" is consistent with the PR objectives while maintaining the technical accuracy of the relaying process documentation.
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/10-Quoting/Quoter API/index.md (1)
42-42: LGTM! Consistent rebranding to SIN
The rebranding from "Synapse RFQ system" to "Synapse Intent Network (SIN) system" is consistent with the PR objectives while maintaining the technical accuracy of the API documentation.
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/index.md (2)
41-41: LGTM! Proper introduction of the SIN acronym.
The change correctly introduces the full name "Synapse Intent Network (SIN)" before using the acronym.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~41-~41: As an alternative to the over-used intensifier ‘very’, consider replacing this phrase.
Context: ...IN) is an RFQ (Request-For-Quote) based <abbr title="'Intent' refers to a user authorizing specific actions that they want to achieve, typically in very simple terms, such as a bridge or swap. Actual...
(EN_WEAK_ADJECTIVE)
125-125: LGTM! Consistent terminology usage.
The changes maintain consistency in referring to the "Synapse Intent Network (SIN) system" across different sections.
Also applies to: 132-132
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/70-CanonicalRelayer/index.md (1)
37-37: LGTM! Clear and concise title.
The simplified title "Canonical Relayer" is appropriate and aligns with the rebranding effort.
docs/bridge/docs/03-RFQ/60-Security/index.md (1)
38-38: LGTM! Consistent terminology.
The introduction properly uses the new "Synapse Intent Network (SIN)" terminology.
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
e3902f6
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://68383d7e.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-docs-sin-tweaks.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
Bundle ReportChanges will decrease total bundle size by 3.16MB (-8.86%) ⬇️. This is within the configured threshold ✅ Detailed changes
ℹ️ *Bundle size includes cached data from a previous commit |
addtl relabeling to Synapse Intent Network from Synapse RFQ.
Various typo fixes.
Summary by CodeRabbit
77cfead: docs preview link