Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(contracts-rfq): reorganise imports #3409

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 24, 2024

Conversation

ChiTimesChi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi commented Nov 24, 2024

Description
A clear and concise description of the features you're adding in this pull request.

Additional context
Add any other context about the problem you're solving.

Metadata

  • Fixes #[Link to Issue]

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced FastBridgeV2 contract with new parameters for bridge transactions, improving functionality.
    • TokenZapV1IntegrationTest now utilizes VaultManyArguments for better testing capabilities.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No significant bug fixes, but improvements in import organization for clarity.
  • Documentation

    • Improved comments and organization within contracts for better readability.
  • Chores

    • Reorganized import statements across various contracts and test files for consistency and clarity.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to import statements across multiple smart contract files in the contracts-rfq package. Key updates include activating previously commented imports, reordering existing import statements for clarity, and adding new parameters to certain functions in the FastBridgeV2 contract. Overall, the core functionality and logic of the contracts remain unchanged, with a focus on improving code organization and preparation for enhanced transaction handling.

Changes

File Change Summary
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/Admin.sol Added active import of UniversalTokenLib.
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/AdminV2.sol Reorganized import statements into categorized sections; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridge.sol Changed order of SafeERC20 and IERC20 imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol Reorganized imports; updated function signatures to include new parameters and deprecate the refund function; enhanced validation in internal methods.
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/libs/UniversalToken.sol Changed order of SafeERC20 and IERC20 imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/zaps/TokenZapV1.sol Reorganized imports for clarity; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml Added sort_imports = true configuration option.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeMock.sol Reordered import of IFastBridge; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.Src.RefundV1.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.t.sol Activated import of IFastBridgeV2Errors and reordered other imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/MulticallTarget.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridge.MulticallTarget.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.MulticallTarget.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Dst.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Src.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/TokenZapV1.t.sol Activated import of VaultManyArguments; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/libs/ZapDataV1.t.sol Reordered imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/mocks/VaultMock.sol Changed order of SafeERC20 and IERC20 imports; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.GasBench.t.sol Activated import of SimpleVaultMock; no functional changes.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.t.sol Reordered import of VaultManyArguments; no functional changes.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

size/xs, needs-go-generate-services/rfq

Suggested reviewers

  • parodime
  • trajan0x

🐰 In the code we hop and play,
With imports shuffled, clear as day.
Functions stay true, logic intact,
Enhancing our contracts, that's a fact!
So let’s celebrate this tidy feat,
For every change makes our code neat! 🐇


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e16814 and 6695e64.

📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/Admin.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/AdminV2.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridge.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/libs/UniversalToken.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/zaps/TokenZapV1.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeMock.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.Src.RefundV1.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/MulticallTarget.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridge.MulticallTarget.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.MulticallTarget.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Dst.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Src.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/TokenZapV1.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/libs/ZapDataV1.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/mocks/VaultMock.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.GasBench.t.sol (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.t.sol (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (16)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/Admin.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/AdminV2.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridge.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/libs/UniversalToken.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeMock.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.Src.RefundV1.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/MulticallTarget.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/UniversalTokenLib.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridge.MulticallTarget.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.MulticallTarget.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Dst.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/FastBridgeV2.TokenZapV1.Src.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/integration/TokenZapV1.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/libs/ZapDataV1.t.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/mocks/VaultMock.sol
  • packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.t.sol
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol (1)
Learnt from: ChiTimesChi
PR: synapsecns/sanguine#3284
File: packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol:100-118
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T03:37:08.148Z
Learning: When reviewing code in `packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol` (Solidity), focus on changes introduced in the PR and avoid commenting on existing functions like `refund` if they are not modified by the PR, as such comments are considered out of scope.
packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.t.sol (1)
Learnt from: ChiTimesChi
PR: synapsecns/sanguine#3284
File: packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.t.sol:53-56
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T03:37:02.230Z
Learning: Modifying test utility contracts in the `test` directory is unnecessary and would only pollute the code.
🔇 Additional comments (9)
packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (1)

20-20: LGTM! The formatter configuration aligns with the PR objectives.

The addition of sort_imports = true will help maintain consistent import ordering across Solidity files, reducing manual effort and potential conflicts.

Let's verify the impact on existing Solidity files:

✅ Verification successful

Enabling sort_imports = true is safe and beneficial for code organization

The current import statements in the Solidity files follow a logical grouping pattern but could benefit from consistent ordering within each group. The formatter configuration will:

  • Sort imports alphabetically within their respective groups (external, internal)
  • Maintain the existing grouping structure (interfaces, libraries, contracts)
  • Help prevent merge conflicts from import reordering
  • Make the codebase more maintainable
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the current import ordering in Solidity files
# This will help understand the impact of enabling sort_imports

# Find all Solidity files excluding legacy contracts
fd -e sol -E 'contracts/legacy/**/*' --exec sh -c '
    echo "\nFile: {}"
    # Extract import statements with line numbers
    rg "^import" -n "{}"
'

Length of output: 82541


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify if there are any Solidity files in the packages/contracts-rfq directory
# and check their current import ordering

# Find all Solidity files in packages/contracts-rfq directory
fd -e sol . packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/ --exec sh -c '
    echo "\nFile: {}"
    # Extract import statements with line numbers
    rg "^import" -n "{}"
'

Length of output: 6382

packages/contracts-rfq/test/zaps/TokenZapV1.GasBench.t.sol (2)

7-7: LGTM! Import statement properly activated

The SimpleVaultMock import is correctly formatted and matches its usage in the test contract.


7-7: Verify similar test files for consistency

Let's check if other test files in the suite have consistent import patterns for SimpleVaultMock.

✅ Verification successful

Import pattern for SimpleVaultMock is consistent

The import pattern for SimpleVaultMock is consistent across the codebase. The file TokenZapV1.GasBench.t.sol is the only test file that imports and uses SimpleVaultMock, and it does so with the correct relative path from the mocks directory. No inconsistencies were found.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for SimpleVaultMock usage patterns across test files
# Expected: Find other test files that might need similar import updates

# Search for SimpleVaultMock usage in test files
rg -t sol "SimpleVaultMock" "packages/contracts-rfq/test/"

# Look for potentially commented imports
rg -t sol "//.*SimpleVaultMock" "packages/contracts-rfq/test/"

Length of output: 175


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for SimpleVaultMock usage in test files without file type restriction
rg "SimpleVaultMock" "packages/contracts-rfq/test/"

# Look for import statements of SimpleVaultMock
rg "import.*SimpleVaultMock" "packages/contracts-rfq/test/"

Length of output: 843

packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/zaps/TokenZapV1.sol (3)

4-9: Well-structured import organization!

The new section headers provide clear separation between different types of imports, improving code readability and maintainability.


12-14: Clean import organization!

The grouping of related imports (IERC20 with SafeERC20) and separation of distinct utilities (Address) follows good practices and improves code clarity.


4-14: Verify import changes across the codebase

Let's ensure the import reorganization doesn't affect other contracts or tests.

✅ Verification successful

Import changes are safe and properly organized

The reorganization of imports in TokenZapV1.sol is safe and follows a clear structure:

  • All files importing TokenZapV1 use the correct relative path
  • IZapRecipient and ZapDataV1 imports are properly referenced by their consumers
  • The import grouping (interfaces, internal, external) improves code readability without breaking any dependencies
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files importing TokenZapV1 to verify the changes don't break existing imports
rg -l "import.*TokenZapV1" --type solidity

# Check for any potential circular dependencies
rg -l "import.*\{.*\}" --type solidity | xargs -I {} rg "import" {} || true

Length of output: 182


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any files importing TokenZapV1
rg "import.*TokenZapV1"

# Check for any files that import from the modified file's path
rg "import.*zaps/TokenZapV1"

# Look for files importing the specific interfaces and libs being reorganized
rg "import.*IZapRecipient"
rg "import.*ZapDataV1"

# Find all Solidity files to analyze import patterns
fd -e sol

Length of output: 20924

packages/contracts-rfq/test/FastBridgeV2.t.sol (2)

12-12: LGTM! Added missing interface import.

Added the import for IFastBridgeV2Errors interface which is required as the contract implements this interface.


18-18: Reordering of named imports.

packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridgeV2.sol (1)

4-19: Effective grouping of import statements improves code organization

The import statements have been reorganized into distinct sections: INTERFACES, INTERNAL IMPORTS, and EXTERNAL IMPORTS. This clear categorization enhances code readability and maintainability by making dependencies more apparent and the structure easier to understand.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.80602%. Comparing base (748a3a2) to head (6695e64).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #3409         +/-   ##
===================================================
- Coverage   42.36502%   41.80602%   -0.55901%     
===================================================
  Files             87          87                 
  Lines           3019        2990         -29     
  Branches          82          82                 
===================================================
- Hits            1279        1250         -29     
  Misses          1737        1737                 
  Partials           3           3                 
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 90.44834% <ø> (ø)
solidity 98.76161% <ø> (-0.10203%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 6695e64
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://6c85ccd3.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://refactor-fbv2-sort-imports.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi merged commit b59c9d0 into master Nov 24, 2024
52 checks passed
@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi deleted the refactor/FbV2-sort-imports branch November 24, 2024 18:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant