fixing swagger docs #3354
fixing swagger docs #3354
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
5296083
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://cdb75b9d.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://docs-fix-swagger.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json (2)
Line range hint
1-1024: Consider enhancing API security measures.The API handles sensitive financial data but lacks several important security measures:
- Authentication/Authorization mechanisms
- Rate limiting specifications
- CORS policy definitions
Consider implementing:
- OAuth2 or API key authentication
- Rate limiting headers and documentation
- CORS policy headers and documentation
Line range hint
1025-1194: Enhance schema documentation for better API understanding.While most schemas are well-documented, some components would benefit from additional descriptions:
model.PutBulkQuotesRequestmodel.PutRFQRequestmodel.PutRFQResponseConsider adding detailed descriptions for all schema properties to improve API documentation quality.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json (2)
10-15: LGTM! Server configuration follows security best practices.
The server configuration properly separates production (HTTPS) and development (HTTP) environments with clear descriptions.
Line range hint 400-500: LGTM! Comprehensive error handling implementation.
The API implements consistent and well-structured error handling:
- Appropriate HTTP status codes
- Detailed error messages with field locations
- Security-conscious error responses
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #3354 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 43.84981% 90.44834% +46.59853%
====================================================
Files 74 54 -20
Lines 2317 1026 -1291
Branches 82 82
====================================================
- Hits 1016 928 -88
+ Misses 1295 95 -1200
+ Partials 6 3 -3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json (3)
Line range hint
1-1024: Consider enhancing API security measures.Several security considerations should be addressed:
- Add rate limiting headers to prevent abuse
- Implement authentication/authorization mechanisms
- Consider reducing error response verbosity to prevent information leakage
Consider implementing the following security enhancements:
- Add standard rate limiting headers:
+ "headers": { + "X-RateLimit-Limit": { + "description": "Request limit per hour", + "schema": { "type": "integer" } + }, + "X-RateLimit-Remaining": { + "description": "Remaining requests for the hour", + "schema": { "type": "integer" } + } + }
- Add authentication security scheme:
+ "components": { + "securitySchemes": { + "ApiKeyAuth": { + "type": "apiKey", + "in": "header", + "name": "X-API-Key" + } + } + }
Line range hint
1024-2048: Consider standardizing response schemas further.While the current schema definitions are good, there's room for improvement in standardization:
- Consider adding a common base response structure
- Add pagination support for list endpoints
Consider adding these common schemas:
+ "components": { + "schemas": { + "PaginatedResponse": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "data": { + "type": "array", + "items": { + "$ref": "#/components/schemas/GenericItem" + } + }, + "pagination": { + "type": "object", + "properties": { + "total": { "type": "integer" }, + "page": { "type": "integer" }, + "limit": { "type": "integer" } + } + } + } + } + } + }
Line range hint
2048-3072: Enhance API documentation with more examples.While the current documentation is good, consider:
- Adding request/response examples for all endpoints
- Including more edge cases in examples
- Adding schema descriptions for all properties
Consider adding more comprehensive examples, especially for error cases:
+ "examples": { + "ValidationError": { + "value": { + "error": { + "message": "Invalid token address format", + "code": "INVALID_FORMAT", + "details": { + "field": "fromToken", + "value": "0xinvalid" + } + } + } + } + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/rest-api/swagger.json (1)
10-15: LGTM! Server configuration follows security best practices.
The server configuration properly separates production and development environments, with production correctly using HTTPS.
|
lgtm i dont think any cors stuff is needed since it calls itself |
Makes sure that the production server is live
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
/bridgeLimits,/bridge,/bridgeTxInfo,/destinationTokens,/swap,/bridgeTxStatus, and/destinationTx.Improvements