add status index

[trajan0x]

Description

Avoid full scan

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved database performance for quote requests by indexing the Status field.

• Bug Fixes

  • No bug fixes included in this release.

• Documentation

  • No new documentation updates.

• Refactor

  • Updated field declarations for better query efficiency.

• Style

  • No style changes made.

• Tests

  • No new tests added.

• Chores

  • No additional chores performed.

• Revert

  • No reverts included in this release.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to the RequestForQuote struct in the services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go file and the PendingProvenModel struct in the services/rfq/guard/guarddb/base/model.go file. The Status field in both structs has been modified to include GORM column and index tags for database schema enhancements. No other modifications to logic or control flow are present in these updates.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go	Updated Status field in RequestForQuote struct to include GORM column and index tags.
services/rfq/guard/guarddb/base/model.go	Updated Status field in PendingProvenModel struct to include GORM column and index tags.

Possibly related PRs

• refactor(relapi): deprecate GetQuoteRequestStatusResponse model #3045: The changes in this PR involve modifications to the Status field in the context of quote requests, which is relevant to the updates made to the Status field in the RequestForQuote struct in the main PR. Both PRs involve GORM tags for database schema enhancements related to the Status field.

Suggested labels

size/s

Suggested reviewers

• trajan0x
• aureliusbtc
• dwasse

Poem

In the land of code where bunnies play,
A field got indexed, hip-hip-hooray!
With queries now swift, like a rabbit's hop,
Our struct stands ready, it won't ever stop!
So let’s celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For changes like these bring us all near! 🐇✨

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5791461 and b6c06c1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• services/rfq/guard/guarddb/base/model.go (1 hunks)
• services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go

🔇 Additional comments (2)

services/rfq/guard/guarddb/base/model.go (2)

44-44: Verify migration handling for the new index.

Since adding an index is a schema modification, ensure there's a corresponding database migration to handle this change.

Let's check for migration files:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Look for related migration files

# Test: Search for migration files related to this change
fd -g '*migration*.go' -x rg -l 'idx_guard_status_name|CreateIndex.*status'

---

44-44: LGTM! Index addition will improve query performance.

The addition of the index on the Status field aligns well with the PR objective to avoid full table scans. This will significantly improve query performance when filtering or searching by status.

Let's verify the index usage with this script:

✅ Verification successful

Index addition is well-justified and actively used

The verification confirms that the status index will be beneficial as there are multiple status-based queries in the codebase:

• GetPendingProvensByStatus performs status-based filtering
• UpdatePendingProvenStatus updates records by status
• Multiple handlers in guard/service/handlers.go modify status values

The index naming convention is also consistent with other similar indexes in the codebase (e.g., idx_rfq_status_name in relayer service).

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for status-based queries in the codebase that will benefit from this index

# Test: Look for WHERE clauses or filters on the status field
rg -g '*.go' 'Where\([^)]*status' || rg -g '*.go' 'Status\s*=|Status:'

Length of output: 171

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more comprehensive search for status-related queries and migrations

# Search for status-related queries in Go files
rg -g '*.go' -i 'status.*where|where.*status'

# Search for any usage of PendingProvenStatus
rg -g '*.go' 'PendingProvenStatus'

# Look for migration files that might handle this index
fd -g '*migration*.go' -x cat {} \;

# Check for any GORM index definitions on status fields
rg -g '*.go' 'gorm:.*index.*status'

Length of output: 6064

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[cloudflare-workers-and-pages]

Deploying sanguine-fe with    Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit:	b6c06c1
Status:	✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL:	https://15dcef26.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL:	https://fix-add-index.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 33.26049%. Comparing base (42c0079) to head (b6c06c1).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##              master       #3340         +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage   33.25951%   33.26049%   +0.00097%     
===================================================
  Files            543         543                 
  Lines          34769       34780         +11     
  Branches          82          82                 
===================================================
+ Hits           11564       11568          +4     
- Misses         22182       22191          +9     
+ Partials        1023        1021          -2     

Flag	Coverage Δ
opbot	0.48870% <ø> (ø)
promexporter	6.81642% <ø> (ø)
rfq	24.67561% <ø> (+0.01403%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)

services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go (1)

87-87: Consider documenting the performance implications.

While adding an index will improve read performance for status-based queries, it may slightly impact write performance. Consider adding a comment explaining this trade-off and why the index is beneficial in this case.

-	Status reldb.QuoteRequestStatus `gorm:"index"`
+	// Status is indexed to optimize queries filtering by quote status.
+	// While this adds minimal write overhead, it significantly improves
+	// read performance by avoiding full table scans.
+	Status reldb.QuoteRequestStatus `gorm:"index"`

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 42c0079 and 5d0a059.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

services/rfq/relayer/reldb/base/model.go (1)

87-87: LGTM! Adding index on Status field will improve query performance.

The addition of the GORM index on the Status field aligns well with the PR objective of avoiding full table scans. This will enhance query performance when filtering or sorting by quote request status.

Let's verify if a corresponding migration file exists: