-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(rfq-indexer): add missing fields #3308
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve the addition of two properties, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/types/index.ts (1)
93-94
: LGTM! Consider reordering properties for consistency.The addition of
originChainId
andoriginChain
to theBridgeProofDisputedEvents
interface is appropriate and aligns with the PR objective of adding missing fields. These properties are consistent with other interfaces in the file and provide valuable information about the origin chain in cross-chain operations.For improved readability and consistency with other interfaces, consider reordering the properties to group related fields together. Here's a suggested order:
export interface BridgeProofDisputedEvents { id: ColumnType<string> transactionId: ColumnType<string> blockNumber: ColumnType<bigint> blockTimestamp: ColumnType<number> transactionHash: ColumnType<string> originChainId: ColumnType<number> originChain: ColumnType<string> chainId: ColumnType<number> chain: ColumnType<string> }This order groups the transaction-related fields, followed by origin chain fields, and then the destination chain fields, which is consistent with the structure of other interfaces in this file.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- packages/rfq-indexer/api/src/types/index.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
Deploying sanguine-fe with Cloudflare Pages
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## feat/explorer-w #3308 +/- ##
===================================================
Coverage 90.44834% 90.44834%
===================================================
Files 54 54
Lines 1026 1026
Branches 82 82
===================================================
Hits 928 928
Misses 95 95
Partials 3 3
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
??? why diff so big.