Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(rest-api): Checks for existence of bridgeTransactions field #3270

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

abtestingalpha
Copy link
Collaborator

@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha commented Oct 11, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enhanced error handling by improving the safety of data access in the transaction controller, reducing the risk of runtime errors.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes made in this pull request involve a modification to the destinationTxController function within the destinationTxController.ts file. The update introduces an optional chaining operator to the assignment of the toInfo variable, enhancing the code's safety by preventing runtime errors when accessing potentially undefined or null properties. The overall logic of the function remains unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/rest-api/src/controllers/destinationTxController.ts Updated the assignment of toInfo to use optional chaining for safety.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fixing issue for wallet integration [SLT-270] #3194: The changes in this PR also modify the destinationTxController function in the same file, specifically related to the handling of the toInfo variable, which is directly relevant to the changes made in the main PR.

Suggested labels

Typescript, M-deps

Suggested reviewers

  • bigboydiamonds
  • trajan0x

Poem

In the code where rabbits hop,
A change was made, we won't stop.
With optional chains, we dance with glee,
Safe and sound, as code should be!
Hopping through lines, we celebrate,
A brighter path, we cultivate! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
packages/rest-api/src/controllers/destinationTxController.ts (1)

Line range hint 18-18: Consider making the GraphQL endpoint configurable

The GraphQL endpoint is currently hardcoded. To improve flexibility and ease of configuration across different environments, consider moving this value to a configuration file or environment variable.

Here's a suggestion for improvement:

  1. Create a configuration file or use environment variables to store the GraphQL endpoint.
  2. Update the code to use the configured value:
- const graphqlEndpoint = 'https://explorer.omnirpc.io/graphql'
+ const graphqlEndpoint = process.env.GRAPHQL_ENDPOINT || 'https://explorer.omnirpc.io/graphql'

This change would make it easier to update the endpoint without modifying the code and to use different endpoints in various environments.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 27019dc and c94c298.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/rest-api/src/controllers/destinationTxController.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
packages/rest-api/src/controllers/destinationTxController.ts (1)

49-49: Excellent addition of optional chaining!

This change improves the robustness of the code by safely handling cases where bridgeTransactions might be undefined or null. It prevents potential runtime errors and aligns with best practices for working with potentially undefined properties.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 31.76937%. Comparing base (acd61de) to head (c94c298).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              master       #3270   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage   31.76937%   31.76937%           
=============================================
  Files            427         427           
  Lines          28496       28496           
  Branches          82          82           
=============================================
  Hits            9053        9053           
  Misses         18597       18597           
  Partials         846         846           
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 90.43902% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: c94c298
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://eaf1ddd3.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://rest-api-existence-check.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha merged commit 2c90cf7 into master Oct 11, 2024
36 checks passed
@abtestingalpha abtestingalpha deleted the rest-api/existence-check branch October 11, 2024 12:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant