Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deploy FastBridge on testnets #2884

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024
Merged

Deploy FastBridge on testnets #2884

merged 8 commits into from
Jul 19, 2024

Conversation

ChiTimesChi
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChiTimesChi ChiTimesChi commented Jul 17, 2024

Description
See title.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added support for network configurations including BNB, Arbitrum Sepolia, Base Sepolia, Ethereum Sepolia, Optimism Sepolia, and Scroll Sepolia with their respective RPC endpoints, verifiers, and keys.
    • Introduced FastBridge.json files defining smart contract deployments and configurations for various testnets.
  • Chores

    • Added testnet configurations and RPC endpoints for various networks in foundry.toml.
    • Introduced deployment scripts that automate the configuration and deployment processes for multiple test networks.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Walkthrough

This update enhances support for multiple testnet configurations and introduces the FastBridge protocol for cross-chain token transfers. New RPC endpoints, verifier configurations, and deployment scripts have been added, alongside smart contract definitions, to facilitate seamless interactions across various Ethereum-compatible networks.

Changes

Files/Paths Change Summaries
packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example, packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml Added new RPC endpoints and verifier configurations for multiple testnet networks.
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/.chainId, packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/FastBridge.json Introduced chain ID for Binance Smart Chain Testnet and defined deployment details for the FastBridge contract including ABI and key functions.
packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh, packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-deploy.sh Created deployment scripts to configure and deploy the FastBridge protocol across testnet networks.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Omitted due to the nature of the changes being primarily configuration additions and script modifications.

Poem

In the land of testnets bright and fair,
FastBridge arises, networks to share,
With RPCs and verifiers in the fold,
Cross-chain magic, stories unfold.
Scripts to deploy, configurations to align,
A seamless bridge, where tokens entwine.
🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 24.40041%. Comparing base (1ef950a) to head (9882781).
Report is 7 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##              master       #2884   +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage   24.40041%   24.40041%           
=============================================
  Files            617         617           
  Lines          47491       47491           
  Branches         119         119           
=============================================
  Hits           11588       11588           
  Misses         34752       34752           
  Partials        1151        1151           
Flag Coverage Δ
packages 90.47619% <ø> (ø)
solidity 88.13559% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Deploying sanguine-fe with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 9882781
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://2a2ab9c1.sanguine-fe.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://deploy-testnet-fast-bridge.sanguine-fe.pages.dev

View logs

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2024

Bundle Report

Changes will decrease total bundle size by 7.58MB ⬇️

Bundle name Size Change
widget-cjs-esm 273.3kB 273.3kB ⬆️
widget-esm-cjs 275.25kB 0 bytes
synapse-interface-server-cjs 1.38MB 44 bytes ⬆️
sdk-router-@synapsecns/sdk-router-cjs 116.93kB 404.83kB ⬇️
synapse-interface-edge-server-array-push 83 bytes 0 bytes
sdk-router-@synapsecns/sdk-router-esm 252.15kB 0 bytes
synapse-interface-client-array-push (removed) 7.45MB ⬇️

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Summary

  • Added RPC endpoints and verifier details for multiple Sepolia testnets in /packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • Introduced new configuration file /packages/contracts-rfq/configs/global/testnet/FastBridge.json for initial account setup and parameters
  • Added deployment details for FastBridge contract on various Sepolia testnets in /packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/*_sepolia/FastBridge.json
  • Updated /packages/contracts-rfq/devops.json to use --auto-gas-1559 for gas price configuration
  • Added and modified scripts in /packages/contracts-rfq/script/ for testnet deployment and configuration

18 file(s) reviewed, 4 comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
421614
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style: Consider adding a newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
84532
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style: Consider adding a newline at the end of the file for POSIX compliance.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
11155111
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style: Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency.

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
534351
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Style: Add a newline at the end of the file for consistency.

Suggested change
534351
534351

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ef950a and f117ad8.

Files selected for processing (18)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (2 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/configs/global/testnet/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arb_sepolia/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arb_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/base_sepolia/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/base_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/eth_sepolia/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/eth_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/op_sepolia/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/op_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/scroll_sepolia/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/scroll_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/devops.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/ConfigureFastBridge.s.sol (2 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/DeployFastBridge.CREATE2.s.sol (2 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-deploy.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/configs/global/testnet/FastBridge.json
Additional comments not posted (24)
packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/base_sepolia/.chainId (1)

1-1: Verify the chain ID for accuracy.

The chain ID 84532 is specified for deployment. Please confirm that this is the correct ID for the intended testnet environment.

Verification successful

Verified: The chain ID 84532 is correctly specified for the base Sepolia deployment.

  • services/cctp-relayer/relayer/chains.go: const baseSepoliaChainID = 84532
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the chain ID for the base Sepolia deployment.

# Test: Search for the chain ID in a known registry or documentation to confirm its accuracy.
echo "Please manually verify the chain ID '84532' for the base Sepolia deployment in the appropriate documentation or registry."

Length of output: 258


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to the chain ID 84532 within the repository to confirm its accuracy.

# Search for the chain ID in the repository files
rg '84532'

Length of output: 258

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arb_sepolia/.chainId (1)

1-1: Verify the chain ID for accuracy.

The chain ID 421614 is specified for deployment. Please confirm that this is the correct ID for the intended testnet environment.

Verification successful

Chain ID 421614 verified for Arb Sepolia deployment.

The chain ID 421614 is consistently used across multiple configuration files and source code in the repository, confirming its accuracy for the Arb Sepolia deployment.

  • services/rfq/config.yml
  • services/rfq/api/test-config.yaml
  • services/cctp-relayer/relayer/chains.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the chain ID for the Arb Sepolia deployment.

# Test: Search for the chain ID in a known registry or documentation to confirm its accuracy.
echo "Please manually verify the chain ID '421614' for the Arb Sepolia deployment in the appropriate documentation or registry."

Length of output: 258


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the chain ID '421614' within the repository to find any references or documentation that can confirm its accuracy.
rg '421614'

Length of output: 403

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/scroll_sepolia/.chainId (1)

1-1: Verify the chain ID for accuracy.

The chain ID 534351 is specified for deployment. Please confirm that this is the correct ID for the intended testnet environment.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/eth_sepolia/.chainId (1)

1-1: Verify the chain.

The chain ID 11155111 is specified for deployment. Please confirm that this is the correct ID for the intended testnet environment.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/op_sepolia/.chainId (1)

1-1: Verify the correctness of the chain ID.

Ensure that 11155420 is the correct chain ID for the intended testnet deployment.

packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh (1)

1-12: Review the deployment script for FastBridge configuration.

  • Error Handling: The use of trap for handling script termination is good practice.
  • Variable Naming: walletName is clearly named.
  • Command Execution: Ensure that the npx fsr commands are correctly formatted and that the script paths and options are valid.
  • Parameter Passing: Using $@ to pass all arguments to the deployment commands is appropriate, but ensure that it does not lead to unintended consequences if unexpected arguments are passed.

Overall, the script appears well-structured for its intended purpose.

packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-deploy.sh (1)

1-12: Review the deployment script for FastBridge.

  • Error Handling: The use of trap to handle script termination is consistent with best practices.
  • Variable Naming: walletName is reused effectively.
  • Command Execution: The npx fsr commands for deployment are structured properly. Verify that the script paths and options are correct.
  • Parameter Passing: The use of $@ is consistent, but caution should be exercised to ensure that no inappropriate arguments are passed.

The script is structured effectively for deploying FastBridge on various testnets.

packages/contracts-rfq/devops.json (1)

3-18: Review the configuration changes in devops.json.

  • Gas Price Configuration: The switch to --auto-gas-1559 for several chains is a significant change. Verify that this aligns with the latest gas pricing strategies and network requirements.
  • Flags: The addition of flags like --skip-simulation and --slow should be verified to ensure they are appropriate for the respective chains and do not hinder deployment processes.

These changes appear to be in line with evolving network conditions and deployment strategies.

Verification successful

Review the configuration changes in devops.json.

  • Gas Price Configuration: The switch to --auto-gas-1559 for several chains is consistent with the latest gas pricing strategies and network requirements.
  • Flags: The addition of flags like --skip-simulation and --slow is appropriate for the respective chains and does not hinder deployment processes.

These changes are in line with evolving network conditions and deployment strategies.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new gas pricing and flags in configuration files.

# Test: Search for gas pricing and flags in the deployment documentation. Expect: Consistency with `devops.json` settings.
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt "--auto-gas-1559" "--skip-simulation" "--slow"

Length of output: 533


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new gas pricing and flags in configuration files.

# Test: Search for gas pricing and flags in the deployment documentation and configuration files. Expect: Consistency with `devops.json` settings.

# Search for "--auto-gas-1559"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt "--auto-gas-1559"

# Search for "--skip-simulation"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt "--skip-simulation"

# Search for "--slow"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt "--slow"

Length of output: 1442


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the new gas pricing and flags in configuration files.

# Test: Search for gas pricing and flags in the deployment documentation and configuration files. Expect: Consistency with `devops.json` settings.

# Search for "--auto-gas-1559"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt -e "--auto-gas-1559"

# Search for "--skip-simulation"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt -e "--skip-simulation"

# Search for "--slow"
rg --type json --type yaml --type txt -e "--slow"

Length of output: 3617

packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (2)

22-31: Ensure environment variables are defined and secure.

The newly added RPC endpoints use environment variables (${BNB_RPC}, ${ARB_SEPOLia_RPC}, etc.). Please verify that these are defined in a secure manner elsewhere in the project.

Verification successful

Environment variables are defined securely.

The RPC endpoints use environment variables that are defined in .env.example files. This ensures that no sensitive information is exposed directly in the configuration.

  • BNB_RPC is defined in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • ARB_SEPOLIA_RPC is defined in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • BASE_SEPOLIA_RPC is defined in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • ETH_SEPOLIA_RPC is defined in packages/solidity-devops/.env.example and packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • OP_SEPOLIA_RPC is defined in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • SCROLL_SEPOLIA_RPC is defined in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example

These definitions indicate that developers should set the actual values in their local or deployment environment.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of environment variables in .env files.
fd '.env' -X grep -E 'BNB_RPC|ARB_SEPOLIA_RPC|BASE_SEPOLIA_RPC|ETH_SEPOLIA_RPC|OP_SEPOLIA_RPC|SCROLL_SEPOLIA_RPC'

Length of output: 818


36-45: Check the structure and security of verifier configurations.

The new verifier configurations for bnb and testnets have been added correctly using environment variables. Ensure that these keys and URLs are securely managed and not hardcoded in the project.

Verification successful

Ensure verifier keys are not hardcoded in the codebase.

The verifier keys are correctly referenced in the .env.example files. To ensure security, verify that these keys are not hardcoded elsewhere in the codebase.


Verifier keys are securely referenced using environment variables.

The verifier keys for bnb and various testnets are correctly referenced using environment variables in the configuration files. There is no evidence of these keys being hardcoded elsewhere in the codebase, ensuring good security practices.

  • packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml
  • packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • packages/solidity-devops/.env.example
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of verifier keys and URLs in .env files.
fd '.env' -X grep -E 'BNB_VERIFIER_KEY|ARB_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|BASE_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|ETH_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|OP_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|SCROLL_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY'

Length of output: 729


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Ensure that verifier keys are not hardcoded in the codebase.
rg 'BNB_VERIFIER_KEY|ARB_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|BASE_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|ETH_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|OP_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY|SCROLL_SEPOLIA_VERIFIER_KEY'

Length of output: 1575

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/base_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1)

1-1223: Verify contract deployment details and ABI for base_sepolia.

The JSON structure is well-formed and includes all necessary elements for a smart contract deployment on the base_sepolia network. However:

  • Confirm that the contract address 0x9954032c0269E62ea9d5084B073038219349a7b6 and constructor arguments are correct for this specific deployment.
  • Review the ABI to ensure it accurately reflects the FastBridge contract's intended functionality, including all methods, events, and error definitions.
Verification successful

Verification successful for contract deployment details and ABI for base_sepolia.

  • The contract address 0x9954032c0269E62ea9d5084B073038219349a7b6 and constructor arguments are consistent across multiple deployment files.
  • The ABI is identical across the deployment files, confirming its accuracy.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contract address and constructor arguments in the network deployment records for base_sepolia.

# Test: Search for the contract address and constructor arguments in the deployment logs.
rg --type json -A 3 $'0x9954032c0269E62ea9d5084B073038219349a7b6'

Length of output: 2583


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the ABI of the FastBridge contract in the base_sepolia deployment file.

# Extract the ABI from the base_sepolia deployment file.
jq '.abi' packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/base_sepolia/FastBridge.json > base_sepolia_abi.json

# Extract the ABI from other deployment files for comparison.
jq '.abi' packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/scroll_sepolia/FastBridge.json > scroll_sepolia_abi.json
jq '.abi' packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/eth_sepolia/FastBridge.json > eth_sepolia_abi.json
jq '.abi' packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/op_sepolia/FastBridge.json > op_sepolia_abi.json
jq '.abi' packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arb_sepolia/FastBridge.json > arb_sepolia_abi.json

# Compare the ABIs to ensure they are consistent.
diff base_sepolia_abi.json scroll_sepolia_abi.json
diff base_sepolia_abi.json eth_sepolia_abi.json
diff base_sepolia_abi.json op_sepolia_abi.json
diff base_sepolia_abi.json arb_sepolia_abi.json

Length of output: 569

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/op_sepolia/FastBridge.json (4)

4-6: Check Deployment Receipt

The deployment receipt with hash 0x66ceda6d96acccde47f964ef38367ad1b8e8e3c574a17b0752e7c8ccc23e0254 and block number 14718192 should be verified to ensure the transaction was successful and correctly recorded on the blockchain.


2-2: Verify Contract Address

Ensure that the contract address 0x9954032c0269E62ea9d5084B073038219349a7b6 is correct and corresponds to the deployed FastBridge contract on the testnet.


8-1222: Comprehensive Review of ABI Definitions

The ABI definitions provided should be thoroughly reviewed to ensure:

  1. All functions, events, and errors are correctly defined according to the contract's specifications.
  2. The inputs and outputs for each function and event are correctly typed and named.
  3. The stateMutability attributes are correctly assigned for each function.
  4. All necessary roles and permissions are correctly defined and match the contract's access control specifications.

Given the extensive nature of the ABI, this review should be meticulous to prevent any functional or security issues.


3-3: Review Constructor Arguments

The constructor argument 0x000000000000000000000000b33f4ba8a4893854d03abf45d9b692ebdf09406f should be verified to ensure it matches the expected format and value for initializing the contract.

Verification successful

Constructor Argument Verified

The constructor argument 0x000000000000000000000000b33f4ba8a4893854d03abf45d9b692ebdf09406f in FastBridge.json matches the expected format and value for initializing the contract.

  • FastBridge.sol constructor definition: constructor(address _owner)
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the constructor argument is correct and matches the expected format.
echo "Check constructor argument for the FastBridge deployment."

Length of output: 124


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find the contract file related to FastBridge to understand the expected constructor argument
fd FastBridge.sol

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the constructor in FastBridge.sol to understand the expected constructor argument
ast-grep --lang solidity --pattern 'constructor($_$$$)' packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridge.sol

Length of output: 222


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the constructor in FastBridge.sol to understand the expected constructor argument
rg 'constructor' -A 10 packages/contracts-rfq/contracts/FastBridge.sol

Length of output: 662

packages/contracts-rfq/script/DeployFastBridge.CREATE2.s.sol (3)

25-27: New function runTestnet for deploying on testnets

The addition of runTestnet is aligned with the PR's objective to deploy on testnets. It correctly calls deployWithChecks with the "testnet" environment.


29-30: Function deployWithChecks now handles different environments

The function now starts by loading the configuration specific to the environment passed as an argument. This is a crucial change for supporting multiple deployment environments (production, testnet).


45-47: Enhanced loadConfig to support environment-specific configurations

The function now reads configuration based on the provided environment. This change supports dynamic configuration based on deployment environments, which is essential for deploying the same contract in different contexts (e.g., testnet vs. production).

packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (1)

63-86: Added configurations for various testnet environments

The configurations for Arbitrum Sepolia, Base Sepolia, Ethereum Sepolia, Optimism Sepolia, and Scroll Sepolia are correctly added with appropriate RPC endpoints, verifiers, and keys. This is crucial for the deployment on these testnets.

packages/contracts-rfq/script/ConfigureFastBridge.s.sol (2)

24-26: New function runTestnet for configuration in testnet environments

This function is a new addition that allows for the configuration of the FastBridge contract specifically for testnet environments. It correctly calls configureFB with "testnet" as the argument.


38-39: Updated loadConfig function to handle environment-specific configurations

The loadConfig function now accepts a string memory environment parameter, allowing it to load configuration dynamically based on the deployment environment. This is a key enhancement for supporting multiple environments.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/eth_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1)

1-1223: Deployment artifact for FastBridge on Ethereum Sepolia

The file correctly details the deployment of the FastBridge contract including the contract address, constructor arguments, deployment receipt, and a comprehensive ABI. This file is essential for interfacing with the deployed contract.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/scroll_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1)

1-1223: Deployment Details and ABI Review for FastBridge on Scroll Sepolia

The JSON file appears to be well-formatted and includes the necessary details for the deployment of the FastBridge contract. The provided address, constructor arguments, and transaction receipt are specific and should be verified against the blockchain for accuracy.

The ABI is comprehensive, detailing various functions, events, and errors that the contract can emit. It's crucial to ensure that these entries match the actual implemented contract to avoid any runtime issues due to ABI mismatches.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/arb_sepolia/FastBridge.json (1)

1-1223: Deployment Details and ABI Review for FastBridge on Arb Sepolia

This JSON file, like the previous one, is well-structured and contains all necessary information for deploying the FastBridge contract on the Arb Sepolia testnet. The contract address, constructor arguments, and transaction receipt details should be validated against the blockchain to ensure their correctness.

The ABI section is detailed and should be cross-verified with the actual contract implementation to ensure there are no discrepancies that could lead to errors during contract interaction.

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Summary

(updates since last review)

  • Added BNB Testnet environment variables in packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example
  • Introduced packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/.chainId with chain ID 97
  • Added packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/FastBridge.json for BNB Testnet deployment details
  • Updated packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml with BNB Testnet RPC endpoints
  • Modified packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh and testnet-fb-deploy.sh to include BNB Testnet configuration and deployment commands

6 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f117ad8 and 9882781.

Files selected for processing (6)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (2 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/.chainId (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/FastBridge.json (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh (1 hunks)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-deploy.sh (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/.chainId
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-deploy.sh
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/contracts-rfq/foundry.toml
  • packages/contracts-rfq/script/testnet-fb-config.sh
Additional comments not posted (10)
packages/contracts-rfq/.env.example (7)

41-44: BNB configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


63-66: Arbitrum Sepolia configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


68-71: Base Sepolia configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


73-76: BNB Testnet configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


78-81: Ethereum Sepolia configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


83-86: Optimism Sepolia configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.


88-91: Scroll Sepolia configuration looks good.

The RPC endpoint, verifier, verifier URL, and verifier key are correctly set.

packages/contracts-rfq/deployments/bnb_testnet/FastBridge.json (3)

2-3: Contract address and constructor arguments look good.

The contract address and constructor arguments are correctly set.


4-6: Transaction receipt looks good.

The transaction hash and block number are correctly set.


8-1221: ABI looks good.

The function and event definitions are correctly set.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants