Submitter: cap transactions in chainConfirmQueue #2789
Conversation
WalkthroughThe code changes introduce a new parameter, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Caller
participant Queue
participant Util
Caller->>Queue: call processConfirmedQueue()
Queue->>Util: call sortTxesByChainID(txs, maxTxesPerChain)
Util-->>Queue: sortedTxes
Queue-->>Caller: processedTxes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
- Introduced
maxTxesPerChainconstant to cap transactions inprocessConfirmedQueue - Modified
sortTxesByChainIDto acceptmaxPerChainparameter - Updated
SortTxesfunction inexport_test.goto includemaxPerChain - Added tests in
util_test.goto verify transaction capping functionality
4 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2789 +/- ##
===================================================
+ Coverage 25.53083% 25.56528% +0.03444%
===================================================
Files 765 760 -5
Lines 54726 54398 -328
Branches 80 80
===================================================
- Hits 13972 13907 -65
+ Misses 39315 39065 -250
+ Partials 1439 1426 -13
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Deploying sanguine-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
68029ac
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://a8800bbf.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://feat-submitter-tx-cap.sanguine-fe.pages.dev |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- ethergo/submitter/export_test.go (1 hunks)
- ethergo/submitter/queue.go (2 hunks)
- ethergo/submitter/util.go (2 hunks)
- ethergo/submitter/util_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
ethergo/submitter/export_test.go (1)
42-43: Update to SortTxes function signature is consistent with PR objectives.The addition of the
maxPerChainparameter to theSortTxesfunction aligns with the PR's goal of capping the number of transactions per chain. This change is consistent with the alterations mentioned in the summary.ethergo/submitter/util.go (1)
Line range hint
106-137: Refactoring and logic addition in sortTxesByChainID function.The implementation of sorting and capping the transactions per chain ID is correctly executed. The use of
sort.Slicefor sorting by nonce and the conditional check to cap the transactions are well-implemented. However, ensure that thegas.CompareGasfunction's behavior is thoroughly tested, especially how it handles transactions with equal nonces but different gas settings.Verification successful
Thorough Testing of
gas.CompareGasFunctionThe
gas.CompareGasfunction is well-implemented and thoroughly tested across various scenarios, including transactions with equal nonces but different gas settings. The test cases cover legacy transactions, dynamic fee transactions, and combinations of both, ensuring comprehensive validation.
- Implementation:
ethergo/chain/gas/cmp.go(lines 23-32)- Test Cases:
ethergo/chain/gas/cmp_test.goThe tests ensure that the function behaves correctly under different conditions, including nil base fees and varying gas prices.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify behavior of gas.CompareGas function in various scenarios. # Test: Search for the function usage and unit tests. Expect: Function calls and test cases. rg --type go $'gas.CompareGas'Length of output: 302
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Locate the implementation of the CompareGas function ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func CompareGas($_, $_, $_) $_' # Display the contents of the test file to review the test cases cat ethergo/chain/gas/cmp_test.goLength of output: 14014
ethergo/submitter/queue.go (2)
102-103: Constant definition for maxTxesPerChain.Defining
maxTxesPerChainas a constant is a good practice for maintainability and readability. This constant is used effectively in theprocessConfirmedQueuemethod to limit transactions per chain, aligning with the PR's objectives.
115-115: Use of sorted transactions in processConfirmedQueue.The use of
sortTxesByChainIDwith themaxTxesPerChainlimit in theprocessConfirmedQueuemethod is a direct application of the newly introduced logic. This ensures that transactions are processed up to the specified limit per chain, which is crucial for managing resources and maintaining system stability.ethergo/submitter/util_test.go (1)
241-258: Testing the SortTxes function with and without transaction cap.The tests for
SortTxesfunction both with the exact number of transactions and with a cap provide a good coverage of scenarios. This ensures that the function behaves as expected in different conditions. It's important to verify that the sorting and capping of transactions are working correctly across various chain IDs.Verification successful
Verified the comprehensive coverage of SortTxes function test cases.
The
TestSortTxesfunction inethergo/submitter/util_test.godemonstrates thorough testing of theSortTxesfunction, including both sorting and capping transactions across various chain IDs.
- The test initializes transactions for multiple chain IDs.
- It validates the sorting functionality with the exact number of transactions.
- It checks the transaction capping functionality.
The tests cover the necessary scenarios to ensure the
SortTxesfunction behaves as expected.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all test cases for SortTxes function to ensure comprehensive coverage. # Test: Search for test cases in util_test.go. Expect: Comprehensive test scenarios. rg --type go 'TestSortTxes' 'ethergo/submitter/util_test.go'Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retrieve the implementation of the TestSortTxes function to verify its coverage. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func (s $_) TestSortTxes() { $$$ }'Length of output: 4151
|
Edget case: this will break if there's more than 100 atetmpts for a tx |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
(updates since last review)
- Updated
.codeclimate.ymlto exclude certain generated files from analysis - Added
signozEnabledfield and middleware functions incontrib/opbot/botmd/botmd.go - Introduced
requiresSignozmethod incontrib/opbot/botmd/commands.go - Added tracing and metrics middleware in
contrib/opbot/botmd/middleware.go - Updated
contrib/screener-api/README.mdto reflect Chainalysis integration
176 file(s) reviewed, no comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings
Addresses #2750
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes